Historians have debunked blitzkrieg and viewed it as nothing

Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 4

Anonymous
2017-06-11 06:04:54 Post No. 2937528
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: 8037675_orig.jpg (361KB, 1100x762px) Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-06-11 06:04:54 Post No. 2937528 [Report]

Historians have debunked blitzkrieg and viewed it as nothing more than desperate improvisation of concentrated offense doctrine (or something, correct me if I'm wrong). If Blitzkrieg wasn't the revolutionary doctrine that changed the concept of war from WWII onward, what then? Was there any at all, however, or did anyone just improve their own from traditional WWI doctrines (with aircraft support, etc.)?

Anonymous 2017-06-11 06:09:50 Post No.2937543
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-06-11 06:09:50 Post No.2937543 [Report]

Soviet Deep Battle more interesting to read about

Anonymous 2017-06-11 06:12:09 Post No.2937548
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-06-11 06:12:09 Post No.2937548 [Report]

File: thinklemon.png (44KB, 1015x961px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 1015x961px

>>2937528
>Historians have debunked blitzkrieg
>'nothing more than desperate improvisation''

Hey Guderain, how will we conduct this offensive?

I dunno man, just do whatever! Improvise!

Anonymous 2017-06-11 06:12:24 Post No.2937549
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-06-11 06:12:24 Post No.2937549 [Report]

>>2937528
How do historians debunk concrete results?

Anonymous 2017-06-11 06:14:24 Post No.2937554
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-06-11 06:14:24 Post No.2937554 [Report]

Blitzkrieg can't be debunked because it's not a thing the war was planned around, attempting to round German schwerpunkt tactics into an imaginary over arching strategy is ridiculous

Anonymous 2017-06-11 06:17:38 Post No.2937556
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-06-11 06:17:38 Post No.2937556 [Report]

File: Fuck yeah.jpg (55KB, 720x431px) Image search: [Google]