What's the civilization equivalent of this?
the ottoman empire
Roman Empire - Byzantine Empire
>>2925817
this is actually really deep
>>2925817
/thread
>>2925810
Western Civilization.
>>2925810
ancien regime france to revolutionary france
3rd reich - modern Germany
>>2925810
Detroit or any other negrified Western city.
>>2925817
the roman empire is the original, pristine painting. Byzantine is the cracked old one with half the head missing
Ottoman empire is the crude, pathetic reproduction that fails so utterly it's not even recognizable as something that's supposed to be like the original
British Empire - United States
>>2925810
Burning Crusade - Legion
>>2925810
Never fails to make me laugh
>>2925810
Achaemenid Empire - Parthian Empire
>>2925810
Christianity
sparta
Industrialization
The Islamic State
>>2925810
Napoleon, French Republic. At the height of the Napoleonic Wars France had a population of around 30 million. Britain with 10 million, half of which were Irish.. That's right, a country the third of the size of the country that almost conquered Europe utterly crushed them. France is now on it's 5th Republic. Britain has ground France into the dirt (and kept it alive in WW1 and WW2) in the past 5 centuries, and continues to do so in all economic and military measurements to this day. Francoboos are eternally on suicide watch. Your language belongs to Africa now.
Soviet satellite states
>>2926982
your language belongs to Americans
check m8
Mongolia...
>>2927005
English has no centralised control. English belongs to the world. Indian English is just as valid South African English, as American English, and English English. Meanwhile the people of Mali and Cameroon have more control over French than the Académie française (I took the liberty of finding the official "French" name, just for you.) Does this annoy you?
>>2926982
>a counrty
Are brits taught in school that they single handedly crushed Napoleon?
>>2927233
No. Unfortunately with a millennia of victory the Napoleonic wars are a mere footnote in British history due to sheer time constraints.
>>2925810
The west
>>2926944
Ted pls
>>2925866
German Empire - Third Reich more like
Likewise, Frederick the Great - Frederick William II
>>2925817
More like Roman Empire to Holy Roman Empire.
Rhodesia - Zimbabwe
>>2925810
Mughal empire - modern india
>>2925810
spain during civilized moor control and then after desu
>>2928206
>Mughal empire - modern india
>>2928221
>Mughal empire: strong and economically stable, but in the 1700's had horrible economic problems which lead to its decline. Also british
>India: shit stain on the world. horrible living standards and terrible cities.
>We will rectify the zionist tumor on our lands and mak....
>Israel triples in size
>>2928231
>Mughal empire: strong and economically stable,
You mean if you were cucked enough to convert to Islam. If you were an average Hindu/Sikh your living condition was shit.
>but in the 1700's had horrible economic problems
You mean they chimped out and tried converting the rest of the sub-continent to Islam.
>which lead to its decline.
They'd probably still be around if they didn't declare jihad.
>India: shit stain on the world. horrible living standards and terrible cities.
And yet much freer for your average person
>>2925810
Ironically, Renaissance Europe.
>ywn be Romans.
German Empire - Nazi Germany
>>2925860
Best post
>>2925817
The Byzantine Empire is more like a classically trained actor who gets old and forgotten and has to make shitty comedies until he dies unceremoniously.
This is more like Rome-Western Successor States, like France, HRE, and the Papal States
>>2925817
Couldn't be a better analogy
>>2925810
Modernism - Postmodernism
>>2928318
Except Byzantium is a direct continuation of the Roman Empire. This picture is in ruins, and a third party comes along and makes it shit.
It's much more like Western Rome
>>2925810
America
>>2925810
Cultural Revolution
>>2925810
History - History books
>>2925817
so true
>>2925810
The Roman Empire - >>>
>>2926234
>latter surpasses the original
What did he mean by this?
>>2925810
anglo-america vs modern america