If the turkish people aren't Turks, how should we call them ?
>>2925697
Roaches
greeks ;)
>>2925697
Romans
Fuck off retards
>>2925697
Turkified Greeks, who in turn were hellenized anatolians (lydians,hittites,luwians,carians etc)
anatolians mongrels
>>2925697
Eternal butthurt source for all balkans.
you should call them your masters
>>2925697
anatolians
>>2925697
It's generally polite to refer to people by their preferred endonym.
>>2925703
>fpbp
/thread/
>>2925697
Roaches.
>>2925697
The traditional term is Osmanli.
The problem is they only Wosmanli. Now they're not.
>>2925697
>extinct
>THEYRE NOT MONGOL
>THEYRE NOT BYZANTINES
>What are they then ?
>*eternal silence*
>>2926220
fuck you anon don't do this
>>2925697
They're still Turks, if "Turks" is to be understood as people from the Republic of Turkey and not an ethnicity.
>>2925858
If you'd extend to them the courtesy of calling them what they identify as, then Turks. I don't see anyone calling the Japanese "Yamato invaders" or the English "Germano-Celtic Normans". If you absolutely have to call them by their ethnic background, then "Anatolians" is the most correct.
>Anatolia
>filled with Greeks, Armenians, Assyrians
>steppe niggers convert to Islam
>finish what the Arabs started
>genocide the Greeks, Armenians, Assyrians
>turn Anatolia into Turkey
>no Anatolians left
why are Turks so genocidal?
even Arabs or Persians didn't do this level of genocide
>>2926339
>No Anatolians left
Well except for the 80 millions who still live there