Why do religious people believe in fantasy bullshit written by goat herders?
>>2925261
Why do Atheists believe in myths told to them by an actor posing to be a scientist?
>>2925267
Why do religious people believe in Magic?
>>2925272
We don't believe in magic, we believe in the power of God.
Why do you believe there isn't anything inherently magical or divine out there?
>>2925287
How's that different from magic?
>>2925287
t. fedora hat
>>2925311
It's natural to think there might be a god, the opposite is a declared mental illness.
>>2925322
Can't you see how smart he is? Only a smart person as him, would be able to argue only based in joke an distortions.
>>2925322
Its also natural to have wisdom teeth and an appendix
>>2925322
> the opposite is a declared mental illness
Declared by the same kind of autistic retards who declared disbelief in communism to be the heavy, most serious case of schizophrenia i.e. by scum, who only cares about pushing their insane ideals.
The only thing dumber than actually believing in an organized religion is believing that abiogenesis is possibly without a deity
>>2925346
Wow, soon or later we would discovery you are a commie teenager, saying it spoil all the fun.
>>2925351
>is possibly without a deity
Le low IQ face
>>2925360
Religion is a mental illness
Psychosis to be exact
It's a mecanism.The mind wants to survive, but he know that the body he's living in is going to die sooner or later. So we make up stories about afterlife and eternity to bear the weight of our miserable condition.
>>2925261
Because underneath the narrative flourishes is a thousands of years old commentary on human behavior, the exoteric aspect of the faith which is used to build up a social trust and promote communal harmony.
They arose as a reaction to the revelation that we live in a world with far more humans that we were evolutionarily equipped to cope with, but what we also have is this adaptation to change itself, called language, which we can use to make conscious adjustments to our behavior in the face of evolutionary pressures.
>>2925267
Why do you let backwoods hicks with Ph.Ds in "Christian education" teach you science? At least Bill Nye can make the case that he comes from a background in applied sciences.
>>2925364
http://www.science20.com/writer_on_the_edge/blog/scientists_discover_that_atheists_might_not_exist_and_thats_not_a_joke-139982
>>2925367
>background in applied sciences.
Most guys here have a better background
>>2925358
Not an argument
>>2925364
It's the equivalent of mental sugar and fat.
We have an innate weakness for it, that made sense at some point to have(follow the alpha unquestioningly, into war or death, because it's better for the tribe than constant internal strife or something) but is now mostly detrimental. And specific religious ideas had, ironicly, an evolution and selection over thousands of years to be most "infectious".
Because it won't let you shit on street.
>>2925409
>Freud
This is a board to history based discussion, not for an old dirty man craziness.
>>2925417
Join the scientologists, they have to deny and demonize psychology and science too.
I'll give you points for not immideately going down the "JEEW" route. What a proud moment for you.
>>2925377
>here
Most people who come "here" are shitty college students who signed up for the engineering program thinking that it was the ticket to a stable, above-average paying job, not realizing yet just how oversaturated the labor market is, how eager CEOs are to replace them with an Indian, and haven't figured out that making it as an engineer requires as much personal drive and initiative as any other field.
>>2925431
Fell bad to waste your money with useless treatments, don't?
>>2925431
He has a point though; clinical Psychiatry is pretty far removed from quasi-scientific Freud, whose ideas have been all but completely debunked.
>>2925261
Mostly because their parents and other people in their community believe in it.
>>2925267
Only a portion of atheists take Bill Nye seriously. On the other hand, most members of Abrahamic religions take their foundational texts seriously. Also, what Bill Nye says can mostly be independently tested. Religious crazies, on the other hand, ask you to take things on faith or because of tradition.
>>2925547
Same as Darwins actual works have been "debunked" since he didn't even know about DNA, but they still are the foundation for the modern understanding of biology and psychology respectively.
But, sure, both totally debunked.
Also darwin fucked his cousin, and evolution is just a theory etc.
because how would a goat herder whould have those ideas on his own