/script>
https://twitter.com/aquamarching?lang=en
isn't there some contradiction here
>>2923276
Vanguardiam with third-worldist undertones.
>>2923276
Lenin and Mao were arguably more similar to each other than either were to Stalin. They both thought that the jump from agrarian feudalism to Marxist-Socialism was possible, whereas Stalin and Marx both believed that industrialization were required first.
Take a ball peen-hammer and smash yourself in the head a few times. When you're slurring your words and can no longer control your bowel movements, you're there.
This works the same with all Marxist ideology.
>>2923282
nigga that makes perfect sense when you say it
>>2923276
same damn communist shit
>>2923276
Marx = Moses
Lenin = Jesus
Mao = Mohammed
A vanguard is needed to skip capitalism and go straight to socialism AND peasants are the real revolutionaries
from my understanding:
since china was not industrialised, mao had a need to incorperates farmers, lumpenproleteriat and small-bourgeoisie as 'the people', as in the revolutionary subject. whilst m-l only sees the working class as the revolutionary subject.
maoist are allegedly more prone to be middle-class /student, and since they dont see the working class as as neccessary as M-L. they sometimes tends to be third-worldist, and in the west their activities usually tends to focus more on third world movements than M-L
since they belive in the people as the revolutionary subject and not just the working class, they tend to be less authoritarian and more prone to work with autonomous groups
idk, probably missed something important. also my understanding comes from being a part of the left, from talking to maoists and M-Ls, might not be accurate to maoist writing, more accurate to maoist practice where I live.