Really makes you think...

>>2899022
India was great in the Golden years... 90s.

>REEEEEIIIIINNAAAAAAAA

>OOOO... OOOOOOH, OOOOOOAAAH OOOA OOOA OOO

>EEEHEEEHEEE. OOOOOOO

4chan was always a pro-India website, then came /pol/ shit.

>>2899037
Literal shit, as in toilet humor. The kind of jokes made by either children or adults of the mental equivalent.

>>2899022
Don't take meme's as peoples serious opinions honestly.
India's development is nothing short of impressive for the backround it came from

>>2899022
>b-but muh colonization was good for development

anglo BTFO

File: q2VNAKo.jpg (58KB, 620x387px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 620x387px

>>2899345
>>2899037
Yeah, because /pol/ is so wrong in making fun of the public health policies of a country whose populace regularly bathes in a river while putrefying corpses float past them.

File: dbti2z3pktoy.jpg (137KB, 683x1024px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 683x1024px

>>2899361
The karmic decline of the Anglo empires gives me great pleasure.

>>2899022
Superpower by 2030

>>2899037
I didn't understand most of your post but India was definitely not in its golden age in the 90s. Post the Islamic conquest India has never had a golden age.

>>2899627
Someone, please explain for this person what I was talking about. Unless this board is really just newfags.

>>2899411
Hygiene =/= Success of nation

>>2899627
keep this post in mind when Pakistan starts nuking everyone moslem rat

>>2899537

Should have took the scottish out the union jack for the brexit reality

>>2899671
You'd think Brits would be able to figure that one out

File: chinachart1.jpg (141KB, 1841x500px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 1841x500px

>>2899022
Now think what they could have accomplished under a national authoritarian government, like the Chinese, in addition to liberalization of the economy and massive trade with the West.

>>2900301
>pic
This kills the "fair" trade proponent

File: The Rajj.png (4MB, 919x2686px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 919x2686px

Cry me a rive pajeets, If India stayed on it's colonial trajectory it would literally be the wealthiest country in the world.
Enjoy your more poverty than sub-Saharan Africa tier independence.

>>2900594
>If India stayed on it's colonial trajectory it would literally be the wealthiest country in the world.
Reconcile this with the image in the OP

>>2900594
>le india was always terrible maymay

>really boils my bouillon cube
Look at how much Japan, Germany, the US and UK were able to grow after they became independent! Oh wait, it's almost as though everyone grew post WWII, coincidentally post Indian independence.

File: 1700_AD_through_2008_AD_per_capita_GDP_of_China_Germany_India_Japan_UK_USA_per_Angus_Maddison.png (789KB, 9606x6112px) Image search: [Google]

789KB, 9606x6112px

>>2900626
Forgot image.

>>2900630
Your graph shows that the UK's GDP per capita approximately triples from 1870 to the end of WW2. At the same time, India's increased slightly, then actually retracted again for decades, until independence.

>>2900630
Is it even worth using GDP as a comparison tool for pre and post ww2 economies. The world changed so much its kind of the apples and oranges argument.

and anyway OP probably just wanted to start a thread on a board as far away from /pol/ as he could find. Even though he probably loves /pol/. Fuckin OP, is and always shall be a fag

>>2899627
>Post the Islamic conquest India has never had a golden age.
Not as a whole no, but I'd argue some states did pretty well here and there regardless.

>>2900599
Are you being serious? I've seen astonishingly mathematical illiteracy in other /his/ threads but this is beyond the pale. Literally every country's economy looks like that if graphed with time being linear on the x-axis. It's exponential growth and it's due to economic development and population growth.
The relationship should be especially pronounced for industrializing countries (they only have to catch up, they can draw on the intellectual accomplishments of western nations) and indeed it is typically but India's economy grew at a SLOWER rate than the UK's from independence up until the 2008 recession.
We could map the UK's economy in the same way and pretend that having to maintain the Raj was what was holding the UK back and the numbers would serve as better substantiation. Correlation does not imply causation.
Look at this anons image >>2900630, If the wealth of the UK was predicated on India or the poverty of India due to colonialism how on earth are we to explain this?

Chinas GDP per capita is now 5 times that of India's.
During the latter days of the Raj India's GDP per capita was twice that of neighboring China!

If that were still true, and it might be if the Raj remained intact and was governed by Keynesian Brits rather than naive hindu traditionalists then the Raj would have about the same GDP as the European Union.

>>2900608
I didn't so much as imply that, nor do I think it.

>>2900765
>Raj remained intact and was governed by Keynesian Brits
This is the problem. Who would want to be cucks ruled by foreigners?

White servants when?

>>2899411
I always wondered if the sea tastes salty because of all the whale piss

It don't know but I still tell people that it's true and that I learned it from critical thinking

>>2900774
I don't know probably the dalits roaming the slums ignominiously because It make Gandhi and his disciples happy.
India was actually primed to become a major world power BECAUSE of the vestiges of colonialism. I don't know how you can be anymore cucked than pursuing a policy of "unlearning" and reliably exacerbating your economic circumstances.

File: muhancestors.jpg (543KB, 2304x2304px) Image search: [Google]

543KB, 2304x2304px

>>2899022
Bullshit graph. Its using the PPP GDP figure for modern period, which doesnt make sense because the Power Purchasing Party during colonial period was the British PPP value. If anything, the PPP capita value fell off a cliff since then

>>2900839
They don't represent India's populace. Hindu nationalism wasn't restricted to one group.

It is due to modern technology not independence.

>>2900765
CHYNA was going through a literal civil war.
India started the reforms a decade and a half later than china, has far more political instability due to constant state level elections. India maintained it's democratic government throughout it's modern day existence while having some of the highest growth in the world.
Of course now all that is about to change because India needs some orange islam to become developed.

>>2900839
What the fuck are you talking about? India maintained nearly all of it's colonial institutions post independence, especially the bureaucracy which was nearly completely run by indians

>>2901014
Also the end of Nehruvian socialism, which is on par of the retardation of maoist China