Were wars with the US and USSR supporting the same side common?
>>2880183
No.
There was the Iran-Iraq War, but the US was playing both sides on that one.
>>2880222
It always makes me laugh when I see a country support both sides of a conflict, like could you be any more transparent with your profiteering?
>>2880183
There was the whole World War II thing. But in all seriousness, quick rundown on the Biafra War? I've heard it was one of the nastier African wars.
The Portuguese proceed to fight a decade against the superpowers for their shitty colony that is gaining them a net negative
>US against Israel
OY VEY!
>>2880222
How does the yank get away with it?
>>2880235
It's when you want both sides to lose.
>>2880222
and how can the supporters of the US foreign policy talk about things like values, democracy 'n shit?
>>2880253
Because if you complain your government gets toppled and/or your country gets blown to smithereens
>>2880318
>toppled
I think you mean liberated.
>>2880253
they don't.
>>2880318
As an American, I only wish our government was that good at its job.
>>2880298
Because the average American will never understand geopolitics except in infinitely stupid narrative terms like "terrorists want to destroy America because it's free". Everyone who supports it is either on the payroll, extremely naive, outright evil, or just doesn't care about values and is tricking other dumber rubes.
>>2880222
ABSOLUTELY PERFIDIOUS
Honestly though the US was based on that one for selling guns to both its enemies so they shoot each other better.
>>2880241
Malawi?