What does /his/ think of benevolent dictatorships?

Oxymoron
If you think people are better off being controlled by others you are by very definition not benevolent.

>>2854897
they're good

>>2854913
There are two different definitions of benevolent, though both meaning the same thing the context matters between personal and an organisation.

>>2854897
Most people think that some absolute leaders in history were good, so don't shit on benevolent dictators.

Democracy is a sham and biggest meme in history, even Socrates knew that.
It's better to have a great experienced dictator who loves him country and will do anything for it, then a politician who cares only about votes and money.

>>2855264
>it's better to have a good leader than a bad leader
Is this your Ph.D. thesis?

File: IMG_1994.jpg (134KB, 659x900px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 659x900px

>>2854897
It's only good when you don't even know it's happening

>>2854897
It's the best option for many societies. Democracy is ok for rich and developed Western countries but in many others people would just turn the country into a shithole (and eventually a dictatorship) if left to their own devices.

>>2855290
What the fuck am I reading, he meant that benevolent dictatorships have an advantage over today's democracy in that dictatorships aren't completely dependent on popularity demographics and can enforce objectively advantageous laws and acts.

>>2855264
Thisu.

>>2854913
Governments all mean being under the authority of others
It can be control by the majority or one dude

File: 1451345145.jpg (26KB, 396x303px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 396x303px

>>2854913
>parents are incapable of being benevolent

>>2855422
>following your biological programming is benevolence

>>2855422
False equivalency

>>2855428
WOW DUDE BIOLOGICAL PROGRAMMING LMAO SO PROFOUND
Your entire brain is biological programming you stupid fuck. That has nothing to do with the definition od benevolent.
>>2855432
Not an argument

>>2855435
Yes it is. Parenting on an individual level is not the same as one man controlling millions.

>>2855457
Same thing happens in democracy, with the difference that you get to choose among the fags handpicked by the political elite to control millions.
Wait did i say choose? Yeah well what you personally choose is statistically irrelevant.

File: hm.png (51KB, 10000x8312px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 10000x8312px

>>2855435
>there is no difference between innate instincts and abstract thought

>>2855490
Innate instincts didn't prevent daddy from leaving you and mommy becoming an abusive crackwhore though did they, you dumb cunt?