Why should I dislike this man? Besides that fact that he has a slight liberal bias, he can be quite informative
>>2846030
I too enjoy receiving my history from a romance novelist for teens.
>>2846030
>slight
Also pretty much everything he says is to some degree an oversimplification.
he put his dick in my breakfast cereal.
>>2846606
He's a cereal rapist?
>>2846030
Because he is a giant faggot who thinks it's good to introduce biased thinking into the most basic of information.
He's one of those who obviously doesn't have an actual love for the subject and sees it merely as a vehicle to push an agenda.
>>2846030
He can make the most interesting periods in history like the Roman Empire, WW2, Peloponnese Wars etc etc boring
Most of us use the "Great Man" view of history where we attribute big periods of history to important historical figures whilst he uses a different perspective where its infinity more boring, looking at history through economics, the transfer or ideas etc.
Take the most boring history lessons you endured in school and that is what you get.
>>2846595
>oversimplification
I don't get this argument, what do you want from a 10-minute internet video? If you want a lot of depth and complexity in your history, read a book.
I have only watched his Capitalism vs Socialism video and he fucking wastes half the video making shitty jokes and doesn't even touch on the key aspects of both
Honestly, he just comes off as a smug cunt.
>>2846030
His brother who does CC biology, psych, and philosophy pushes his left wing views as well. Really wish they would shut the fuck up about their views. It's infuriating to know that they are alienating children all around the world by doing this. Imagine a child's parents are Trump supporters. The kid is too young to understand politics so he has no idea. Hank and his bro are like "Hurr and Trump ius a hitler hurrr fucking red necks hahahaha". That kid would feel so alone and alienated when his classmates make fun of him for it.
The irony is that judging by their comment sections they probably have more RIGHT leaning people watching than brainlet SJWS.
How unlikely the frequency of historical talent is!
Unthinking people who write as historians in the naive belief that their own age is right in all its popular views and that to write by the standard of the time generally amount to being right
Those naive historians call "objectivity" the process of measuring past opinions and deeds by the universal public opinion of the moment.Here they find canon of all truths.
Their work is to adapt the past to contemporary trivialities.
>informative
no he isnt informative, hes factually wrong in most of his videos
hes the arch enemy of history
>does no research
>le popular media for the masses
>political narratives
>>2847527
How is that a bad thing? Shouldn't a kid be allowed to be exposed to different views then those he grew up with? Shouldn't they be allowed to be challenged, to reach their own conclusions and see the nuance in the world?
If someone can genuinely challenge an idea to the point they can make someone reconsider what they've been taught from birth, then quite frankly they should be allowed to speak as much as they want.
>>2846030
>slight
John green is reddit
Tom Richey is /his/
>>2846030
>quite informative
If you're like 8 maybe yes
>>2847763
>Tom Richey
Agreed.
>>2846030
DUDE MONGOLS LMAO