Let's try and reduce each philosophy to a digestible one-liner. I'll start:
>Stoicism: Buddhism without the Bullshit.
>>2813146
Stoicism: punch a stoic, he doesn't punch back.
>>2813146
Stoicism: I graduated philosophy, and I cry when I get home from my McDonalds job.
Taoism: Alchemy masquerading as metaphysics.
>>2813146
Marxism: From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.
Judaism: What's mine is mine, what's yours is also mine goyim.
Zhukovism: Every dead russian is a nail in the nazi coffin.
>>2813146
Stoicism: a pessimistic Buddhism.
Socratic virtue: We don't know much but we try our best
>>2813146
That bust is of Epicurus, not Epictetus. I see this mistake everywhere, someone is out to confuse a lot of people.
Idealism: It's all in your head.
>>2813565
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cU8HrO7XuiE
>>2813211
Isn't Buddhism in and of itself inherently kind of pessimistic, though? Emptiness and non-duality strike me as pretty pessimistic, and their entire view of the world is one of relative negativity, since it's something that you want to escape.
Unless we're talking about Mahayana Buddhism, in which case a Bodhisattva is only a Bodhisattva because he chooses to stay to enlighten others, implying that staying sucks and the dude's a saint for doing so.
Buddhism and Stoicism are nothing alike you mentally deficient child.
Buddhism is far closer to Epicureanism than Stoicism. The closest thing to Stoicism in Eastern thought would be Taoism.
>Stoicism: don't put yourself in sucky situations and nothing will suck.
>Buddhism: freedom is achieved by letting go of desire.
They're nothing alike.
>>2813146
>Nietzcheanism: yolo∞
>>2813910
Off yourself
> Pyrronism : idk man, both sides can be argued for