Why do dynasties have a 100% failure rate

people die n shit

>>2812401
Decadence and hubris.

After enough generations in power, a royal family forgets the values that put it there.

Inbreeding

File: 0810.14.jpg (333KB, 933x1212px) Image search: [Google]

333KB, 933x1212px

Say what now?

>>2812459
True.
But that's only because for a long time Emperor's didn't even have enough power to be worth ousting or overthrowing.

And also you have to consider the unique hyper-robotic autism that is Japanese culture

a) No guarantee of an heir
b) Multiple potential heirs cause problems
c) Stances and values of the dynasty members become stagnant because they're so insular

All of the above just get worse as time goes on.

>>2812401
Current Republics have just 200 years of history under their belt. They can't say shit.

Denmarks Royal family goes back to Gorm the Old

why does life have 100% failure rate

Because humans aren't immortal? What kind of a stupid ass question is this?

>>2813828
>Life is meant to produce offspring
>You have a mommy and a daddy and are currently posting in a mongolian basket-weaving forum
>100% failure rate

File: You know who.jpg (14KB, 448x312px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 448x312px

>>2812401

DURRRRRRRRR

>>2813922
>this kills the monarchist

>>2813925
The previous king had actually a normal kid that grew into adulthood, but died too soon.
There was also a very capable halfbrother and a militarily and political active and decent enough bastard son who almost would have got the spanish crown, so the Spanish Habsburg dynasty would have continued if G*D did not really really hate them.

>>2812401
Because literally everything has a 100% failure rate.

File: pbblbblbl.png (105KB, 219x222px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 219x222px

>>2812401
>>2813922

>>2813956
Maybe they should stop fucking each other first, like good Christians are supposed to not do.