Islamic Holocaust of Hindus

>>2808934
>“The Mohammedan conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. The Islamic historians and scholars have recorded with great glee and pride the slaughters of Hindus, forced conversions, abduction of Hindu women and children to slave markets and the destruction of temples carried out by the warriors of Islam during 800 AD to 1700 AD. Millions of Hindus were converted to Islam by sword during this period.”

>“The Muslim conquests, down to the 16th century, were for the Hindus a pure struggle of life and death. Entire cities were burnt down and the populations massacred, with hundreds of thousands killed in every campaign, and similar numbers deported as slaves. Every new invader made (often literally) his hills of Hindus skulls. Thus, the conquest of Afghanistan in the year 1000 was followed by the annihilation of the Hindu population; the region is still called the Hindu Kush, i.e. Hindu slaughter.”

>The Afghan ruler Mahmud al-Ghazni invaded India no less than seventeen times between 1001 – 1026 AD. The book ‘Tarikh-i-Yamini’ – written by his secretary documents several episodes of his bloody military campaigns : “The blood of the infidels flowed so copiously [at the Indian city of Thanesar] that the stream was discoloured, notwithstanding its purity, and people were unable to drink it…the infidels deserted the fort and tried to cross the foaming river…but many of them were slain, taken or drowned… Nearly fifty thousand men were killed.”

>>2808934
Not enough sadly

File: taj.jpg (2MB, 2040x1681px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2040x1681px

>it is stated that when Qutb-ul- Din Aibak (of Turko – Afghan origin and the First Sultan of Delhi 1194-1210 AD) conquered Meerat, he demolished all the Hindu temples of the city and erected mosques on their sites. In the city of Aligarh, he converted Hindu inhabitants to Islam by the sword and beheaded all those who adhered to their own religion.

>The Persian historian Wassaf writes in his book ‘Tazjiyat-ul-Amsar wa Tajriyat ul Asar’ that when the Alaul-Din Khilji (An Afghan of Turkish origin and second ruler of the Khilji Dynasty in India 1295-1316 AD) captured the city of Kambayat at the head of the gulf of Cambay, he killed the adult male Hindu inhabitants for the glory of Islam, set flowing rivers of blood, sent the women of the country with all their gold, silver, and jewels, to his own home, and made about twentv thousand Hindu maidens his private slaves.

This ruler once asked his spiritual advisor (or ‘Qazi’) as to what was the Islamic law prescribed for the Hindus. The Qazi replied:

>“Hindus are like the mud; if silver is demanded from them, they must with the greatest humility offer gold. If a Mohammadan desires to spit into a Hindu’s mouth, the Hindu should open it wide for the purpose. God created the Hindus to be slaves of the Mohammadans. The Prophet hath ordained that, if the Hindus do not accept Islam, they should be imprisoned, tortured, finally put to death, and their property confiscated.”

File: Eminent_Historians.jpg (7KB, 131x200px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 131x200px

Left-wing historians will say that this is just poetic exaggeration of chroniclers, that Muslims dindu nuffin, all because they don't want to alienate the Muslim voting bloc for the INC.

I hate leftists. In the West they can't shut up about imperialism, in order to raise identity politics of non-whites through victimization. In India, where Hindu nationalism is identified with the right-wing, they laugh at one of the most bloodthirsty imperialisms ever see, and try to make identity politics (they call it communitarianism there) unacceptable.

>>2808971
I'm so happy that leftists exist so you continue to stay mad.

I remember a leftcuck tried to argue once that prior to the arrival of the British there was no real separation between muslim and Hindu Indians.

Gosh I hate leftcucks.

>>2808971
What, i don't say that.
Everyone and their mom knows that only Jains truly didn't do nothing in the history of India.
Hindu extremists are reactionary right

File: ppe.jpg (309KB, 2420x2272px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 2420x2272px

>>2808967
>If a Mohammadan desires to spit into a Hindu’s mouth, the Hindu should open it wide for the purpose. God created the Hindus to be slaves of the Mohammadans. The Prophet hath ordained that, if the Hindus do not accept Islam, they should be imprisoned, tortured, finally put to death, and their property confiscated.

File: narendra_modi.jpg (112KB, 1001x728px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 1001x728px

>>2809021
It's ok, I have found a champion.

>>2808934
>>2808942
>>2808948
>>2808963
>>2808967
>>2808971
And nobody believes this for a second Pajeet.
Ignoring Timur's rageout, nobody believes that non-muslims were massacred by the millions but retarded pajeets like yourself.

File: shaheed.jpg (21KB, 279x397px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 279x397px

>“In a short space of time all the people in the [Delhi] fort were put to the sword, and in the course of one hour the heads of 10,000 infidels were cut off. The sword of Islam was washed in the blood of the infidels, and all the goods and effects, the treasure and the grain which for many a long year had been stored in the fort became the spoil of my soldiers.

>“They set fire to the houses and reduced them to ashes, and they razed the buildings and the fort to the ground….All these infidel Hindus were slain, their women and children, and their property and goods became the spoil of the victors. I proclaimed throughout the camp that every man who had infidel prisoners should put them to death, and whoever neglected to do so should himself be executed and his property given to the informer. When this order became known to the ghazis of Islam, they drew their swords and put their prisoners to death.”

>>2809041
Islam has been doing jihad in India for centuries, such a body count is in bounds.

File: bhai.jpg (41KB, 282x278px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 282x278px

>>2808934
The Afghan ruler Ahmad Shah Abdali attacked India in 1757 AD and made his way to the holy Hindu city of Mathura, the Bethlehem of the Hindus and birthplace of Krishna.

The atrocities that followed are recorded in the contemporary chronicle called : ‘Tarikh-I-Alamgiri’

>“Abdali’s soldiers would be paid 5 Rupees (a sizeable amount at the time) for every enemy head brought in. Every horseman had loaded up all his horses with the plundered property, and atop of it rode the girl-captives and the slaves. The severed heads were tied up in rugs like bundles of grain and placed on the heads of the captives…Then the heads were stuck upon lances and taken to the gate of the chief minister for payment.

>“It was an extraordinary display! Daily did this manner of slaughter and plundering proceed. And at night the shrieks of the women captives who were being raped, deafened the ears of the people…All those heads that had been cut off were built into pillars, and the captive men upon whose heads those bloody bundles had been brought in, were made to grind corn, and then their heads too were cut off. These things went on all the way to the city of Agra, nor was any part of the country spared.”

Why are Muslims so heartless?

File: 1451064260098.jpg (1MB, 1200x1800px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1200x1800px

Aryan bros need to unite against the three headed hydra of Abrahamism, desu

>>2809213
That religions is truly more interesting. But it isn't structured at all, how would you unite them when myths, gods etc are too different?

>copypasta from hindu nationalist sites

atleast be a little subtle about this shilling, pajeet

Don't forget how Muslims annihilated Buddhists in Central and South Asia; something which leftists conveniently ignore. Turkic Muslim invaders sacked and destroyed countless Buddhist sites including Nalanda, one of the preeminent sources of Buddhist scholarship and its library. Indian Buddhists had to flee to Tibet and SE Asia.

>>2808934

Hyperbolic, misinterpreted, lacking in genuine historicity, reinterpreted, biased - the list of denunciations against your quotes and manifold and not addressed at all.

It is propaganda for all it's worth.

Can anyone recommend any books on pre-colonial Muslim-Hindu conflict?

I've heard about shit like the greentext excerpts before but there appear to be few English language sources on it

>eliminating pajeets
>bad

>>2809213
>that comic

kek

>>2809293
This is coming straight from the mouths of the Muslim leaders who did this. They bragged about it.

>>2809313
The Age of Wrath: A History of the Delhi Sultanate

>>2809238
The Indo-European spirituality is all derived from the same Aryan root, they're just different names for the same entities. Minus the extraneous examples of syncretism, like Proto-European gods melding into the mythology or in the case of Hinduism, local Dravidian ethnic gods merging.

>More important than what Genghis Khan conquered was how he conquered. He deliberately used terror as a weapon of war. If a city he was besieging gave up without a fight, its people would usually be spared but would have to go under Mongol control. If the city fought against the Mongols, everyone, including civilians, would be massacred. This reign of terror is a large part of why he was such a successful conqueror. People were more willing to give up than to suffer massacres at his hand. For example, when he besieged the city of Herat, in present-day Afghanistan, he killed over 1,600,000 people.

>Besides some raids and massacres on the borderlands of Islam, Genghis Khan did not invade far into the Muslim world. Under his successor, Ogedei, the Muslim world continued to be spared Mongol wrath. However, in 1255 that peace would end. The Great Khan, Mongke, put his brother Hulagu Khan in charge of an army whose goals were to conquer Persia, Syria, and Egypt, as well as to destroy the Abbasid Caliphate. The campaign’s goal appears to be a complete destruction of Islam. Hulagu himself even had a very deep hatred for everything attached to Islam. Much of this came from his Buddhist and Christian advisors who influenced his policies.

>>2809244
>"God created the Hindus to be slaves of the Mohammadans. The Prophet hath ordained that, if the Hindus do not accept Islam, they should be imprisoned, tortured, finally put to death, and their property confiscated."

HOW can you defend that?

>>2809324
That's sort of the point of aggrandizing propaganda and exaggeration.

>>2809375
Exactly. That's why I hate how /his/torians believe the Nazis writing down that they were gonna "exterminate jewry" means they actually did.

>>2808934
It's not even a holocaust and more of a spanish conquista, even then it's still much more tolerant

File: BandaSingh.jpg (57KB, 607x362px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 607x362px

>“throughout the camp that every man who has infidel prisoners was to put them to death, and whoever neglected to do so should himself be executed and his property given to the informer. When this order became known to the ghazis of Islam, they drew their swords and put their prisoners to death. 100,000 infidels, impious idolaters, were on that day slain. Maulana Nasir-ud-din Umar, a counselor and a man of learning, who, in all his life had never killed a sparrow, now, in execution of my order, slew with his sword fifteen idolatrous Hindus, who were his captives“.

>Banda Singh Bahadur was tortured to death after being imprisoned for 3 months. The heart of Banda Singh’s son was put in his mouth in an attempt to humiliate him

>>2809347
Any good book about the Roots and stuff to learn about it?

>>2809041
Sure achmed

Islam is a religion piss and flowers and would never do that

>>2808967
#ReligionOfPeace

>>2809409
>The heart of Banda Singh's son was put in his mouth in an attempt to humiliate him

I'm sorry, but this is just cruel.

File: Baba-Banda-Singh-Ji-Bahadur.gif (72KB, 340x306px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 340x306px

>>2809409
>>2809532
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banda_Singh_Bahadur#Execution

>On 7 December 1715, Banda Singh Bahadur was captured from the Gurdas Nangal fort and put in an iron cage. The remaining Sikhs were captured and chained.[40] The Sikhs were brought to Delhi in a procession with the 780 Sikh prisoners, 2,000 Sikh heads hung on spears, and 700 cartloads of heads of slaughtered Sikhs used to terrorise the population.[41][42] They were put in the Delhi fort and pressurised to give up their faith and become Muslims.[43]

>On their firm refusal all were ordered to be executed. Every day, 100 Sikhs were brought out of the fort and murdered in public.[44] This continued for approximately seven days.[45] After 3 months of confinement,.[46] On 9 June 1716, Banda Singh's eyes were gouged out, his limbs were severed, his skin removed, and then he was killed.[3][47]

>>2809543
>On 9 June 1716, Banda Singh's eyes were gouged out, his limbs were severed, his skin removed, and then he was killed
>then he was killed
>THEN HE WAS KILLED

I understand why they hate Muslims so much now.

>>2809365
Mongols paid the price for destroying Baghdad when three of the four Khanates eventually converted to Islam.

>>2809041
t. Muhammad

So how was India able to remain Hindu even with centuries of Muslim oppression?

>>2809545
same. those bedouins who call themselves arabs have no dignity.

>>2808967
>If a Mohammadan desires to spit into a Hindu’s mouth, the Hindu should open it wide for the purpose

This sounds like some ISIS shit

>>2809375
I told you >>2808971

>>2809409
>>2809543
IT'S JUST EXAGGERATION, GUYS. THAT'S WHY I'VE LEARNED AT JNU, IF WE START SAYING OTHERWISE, MUSLIMS MAY GET ANGRY AND STOP VOTING FOR THE INC, AND WE DON'T WANT THAT TO HAPPEN.

>>2809040
Hindu Nationalism is blatantly revisionist to the point of literal fraud. They are cancer.

File: michel-foucault - 13jun11.jpg (67KB, 589x600px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 589x600px

>>2809692
It's 2017, there is no objective reality, if Hindu nationalists want to believe that Indo-Europeans are native to India and that the Vedas have a greater awareness of the natural world than modern science, that is just fine. The grand metanarratives of progress are dead anyway.

In the end, "dumb" Hindu nationalists have been better rulers than all those educated intellectuals from the JNU that made India lag behind the rest of the world for decades with their enlightened socialism.

>>2809396
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

YES

>>2808934
>>2808971

t.Hindutva
What's up with calling every invasion and/or massacre Holocaust?

Holocaust complex?

It's like saying the Spaniards holocausted the indians on purpose. They did killed a lot of them, destroyed their culture and did atrocities but it isn't like they said "Let's go to the new world and kill every single indian because I'm crazy/racist/zealous".

Yes fucking faggot all those horrible shit happened but to say the muslims went there ONLY to kill and raze temples is stupid.

Appart from that, the hindus since the 50s have been going full retard and killed lots of muslims and destroyed mosques so I guess you fags are even.

>>2809733
>blacks have killed a lot of white people since the 1950s, so they and whites are even for slavery

Not a single Western leftist would say that. Not a single Western leftist would brush off the crimes of Western imperialism the way Marxists in India do with Muslim crimes.

>It's not like Leopold II went to the Congo and said: "Let's kill every single nigger" so there was nothing wrong with the Congo Free State

You are disgusting hypocrites.

Faggotty leftists will deny the suffering of Hindus, Buddhists, and Christians to placate their image of Muslim ego for some reason.

Maybe their unfamiliarity with the sheer scale and completeness of the devastation makes them uncomfortable.

>>2809763
Muslims vote for left-wing parties, both in the Western world and in India. That's the reason why they placate Muslims.

>>2809751


Retard. Leopold II did a lot of shit yes but from what I'm reading in this thread you are trying to say is the muslims who conquered India were doing that stuff because they just wanted to kill all hindus unless they convert to Islam. Plus it's not like the hindus were all good boys who din du nuffin. Also, you are implying there were "hindus" when calling it Hinduism is a modern thing. The muslims probably believed in that time they were just killing infidels who some believed in one of those blue gods and the rest believed in some red guy.

>>2809763
Tell me more about this. Is it to get the muslim vote?

>>2809776
Ironically, the only place where Muslims don't vote for left-wing parties is the actual Muslim world. So you get the interesting phenomenom of Western (and Indian) left apologizing for Muslims, while in the Middle East and North Africa, leftists hate Islam and try to get rid of it in the public sphere.

>>2809784
We can only expeculate on the reasons, but the historical fact is undeniable, the Muslim conquest of India was responsible for dozens of millions of deaths and uncountable suffering and oppression for native people. The kind of experience that, when experienced by blacks, indigenous peoples, or even Muslims, justifies a measure of nationalism, according to the Western left.

But when Hindus try to self-organize to rise above their history of oppression they are criticized for "commutarianism".

File: muhancestors.jpg (543KB, 2304x2304px) Image search: [Google]

543KB, 2304x2304px

Indian religion and national identity is pretty much fabricated in response to Muslim invasions and empires.

Hinduism according to them is a trillion years old. Anything that is not Islam, is Hinduism by definition, so they literally make shit up as they go along and call it Hinduism and India. They had millions of gods with no connection between them. The caste system prevented any sort of nationhood so Muslim kings literally strolled in and took what ever the fuck they wanted.

Even today, Indians define their identity by whichever civilization is the oldest in the subcontinent. In this case, based around the Indus River in Pakistan where Punjabis, Sindhis and Pashtuns have lived for as long as records go back. This hasn't stopped Indian historians from fabricating various migration theories that conveniently move the civilization to modern day India.

The most significant places in the subcontinent are located in Pakistan. Ghandara, Indus valley, Punjab, Sindh (from which India even managed to steal the name). The Greeks only knew of the place which made up the Indus river basin. Beyond that, nothing of significance was ever recorded. Arab travelers described millions of villages with nothing in common with each other. During the Arab era, Hindu referred to the region. It was not a religion. Hence the term Muslim Hindus. At some point, someone realised what was happening and took the initiative to create a religion for non Muslim Hindus. Everything you know about Hinduism was created after this, so in that sense, Hinduism is one of the newest "old" religions in the world.

File: kadakapally_0.jpg (117KB, 960x555px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 960x555px

>>2809971
t. JNU (((historian)))

>>2809656
You weren't speaking to me nor am I interested in you injecting politics into historical studies because you're angry about bad Indian historians injecting their politics.

>>2809396
Except they actually did, because they weren't writing for the benefit of their own dynastic histories and diplomatic bragging.

File: ! ! ! ! HAAAAAAAAA.png (107KB, 291x287px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 291x287px

>>2809213
FUCKING KEK.

>>2809054
Treasonous sikhs tried overthrowing the king
Get beheaded
Not even original tho

Killing millions of Hindu subhumans is one of the few good things done by Mudslim sandniggers. Unfortunately, those retarded monkeys haven't finished their job and Pajeets are still here.

>>2809054
mmmmmmmbetter check where the word shaheed comes from first

>>2809626
muslims get to tax infidels and having such an abundant tax farm is not something to discontinue.

>>2809367
>who are Dalits

>>2809971
Indus civilization was made by Dravidians

>Muslims brutally murdered Hindus in India
>80% of modern India is Hindu
Am I missing something here?

>>2810579
>> We Waz Kangz

I am sure it was Rajesh.

>>2810668
Pajeet historical facts don't always make sense.

See >>2809971

They literally fabricate everything there is to know about religion, history, economy, reality.

>>2809733
Spaniards committed cultural genocide, they purposefully went through great lengths to erase their identity and culture.

>>2810668
Whenever you kill a Hindu 4 take his place, they are similar to Chinamen in this way.

>>2809260
The Mongols did far more damage than any Islamic invasion.

>>2809260
Pajeet shitposting. Mongols annihilated everything, including Muslims, before converting to Islam.

>>2808934

They clearly didn't do enough since poo in loos still infest.

I honestly don't see anything wrong with killing Hindus

File: fighting-germany-spies-001.jpg (355KB, 1014x1400px) Image search: [Google]

355KB, 1014x1400px

People that are ok to hate on /his/

>Germans
>Hindus

I wonder who is behind this kind of psychological warfare.

>>2808971
I think you have no idea what a leftist is.

>>2811788
>People that are ok to hate on /his
Better add the Mongols, Americans of all kinds, British, Muslims, and Communists to that list

File: what-europe-might-have-looked-like-if-it-had-been-colonised-695x391.jpg (45KB, 695x391px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 695x391px

>>2809971
>eternal Anglo makes arbitrary borders and a national identity from nothing and then accuses the natives of we wuzing each other

only good indian is a dead one
>tfw my ancestors killed poopoo in looloos for sport
>tfw have fucked 3 'high caste' light skinned 'white' looking indian girls
>tfw some beta poopoo in the looloo is going to have to settle for sloppy seconds

>>2810668
Indians like to fuck with no condoms

>>2809213
my sides

>>2809213
Whose the guy on the far right? Zoroaster?

Reading this, I fully agree that Muslims deserve the slaughter being wrecked upon them by Hindu nationalists and the RSS nazis. Pakistan should be destroyed

muslim invaders didn't kill hindudindus because they were muslim

muslim invaders killed poos because they were mongols and turks who viewed non turco-mongols as inferior and punished any disobedience heavily

Maybe it is not such a bad thing, the Islamic holocaust spurred on the evolution of the Sikh.

Humans were not supposed to be evil degenerates but they weren't supposed to be meek and complacent either.

>>2813856
Not really.

Mughal Empire for example got sacked and raped because it kept trying to ally with the Ottomans against the Safavids and Nadir Shah, so he decided to go down there and take them Pajeets a lesson or hundred.

>>2813856
Why were the anatolian greeks assimilated instead of being genocided then?

>>2808971
Leftists are secularists. It's liberals who suck off the muzzies

>>2808934
Pajeet, if Muslims were really interested in killing Hindu nufins, your nation and religion wouldnt exist anymore.

In less than a 1500 years, Muhammadans went and genocided every known religious group (even themselves) and yet National Socialists gets the blame.
In less than a century, Social-Democrats ('communists', 'socialists', the one and same) went and genocided more nationalities, religious groups and people in general than any other religious or political group in known history and yet 'reactionaries', those with 'cold war bias' and 'anticommunists' gets the blame.

India's a weird case actually. Their leftists are literally exactly like ours. Carbon copies. Peculiar Islamophile types - maybe it's the shared Indo-European genetics that makes our respective leftards so similar.

One of the things they're responsible for is the blackening of the Raj period. They basically wanted to use the Mughal period and the fictitious "Muslims and Hindus lived together in peace" as a foil against the British who supposedly drove these two groups apart.

>>2809293
>Heh, I'm so erudite. The more I bash my own race and inflate the achievements of other races, the more unbiased I am. This is because my ego is paradoxically symbiotically attached to the denial of my own group identity.

>>2809545
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marco_Antonio_Bragadin

They did the same to us Hindu-bro.

>cucked by a minority in your own country
>expect sympathy

>>2809733
>It's like saying the Spaniards holocausted the indians on purpose

Except this fake history meme has widespread credence in the western world, it is even taught at major western universities.

The funny thing is, the group that best fit this fantasy version of Islam as some noble brown person religion akin to some sort of stoicism that western orientalists and libtards have constructed over the years are Sikhs.

there's literally nothing wrong with them killing hindus

every group that has invaded india throughout history has done the same, both before and after islam

this 'genocide' of poos happens because the invaders are disgusted by the beta servile attitudes of the disgusting poo in loos that only slaughter can rectify

indians are a slave race for a reason

>>2815426

This is so fucking true.

The only two groups I actually respect from the subcontinent are Punjabis and Pashtuns. They fought whoever came their way and took a stand against Persians, Greeks, Brits, Soviets, Americans. Most Indians are well known for rolling over completely.

File: 1434126418180.gif (1003KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

1003KB, 500x500px

>>2809213
Expect this to be reposted. Its mine now, you hear me? MINE

>>2815502
>punjabis
get the fuck out of here poo poo pakishit

the only punjabis worth a damn are sikhs, and even they got their shit kicked in several times by muslims

>>2809213
>>2809323
>>2810097
>>2812050
>>2812515
>>2814191

Same fag.

Shittiest picture I have seen in a long time. I cant even tell what the fuck is happening.

>>2815525
kek

Ok Pajeet.

Sikhs are dumb as fuck. Managed to lose most of their territory and religious sites.

>>2815569
I'm the one who originally posted what you replied to you dumb fucking paki indian nigger

>>2809451
Comparative Mythology by Jaan puhval

well hindus should have embraced islamic toilet etiquette if they didn't want to be killed

File: 1493770407257.jpg (94KB, 680x792px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 680x792px

>>2815648

Sure Pajeet. 4d chess. I sure got served.

>>2816064
pakis are literally muslim indians

off yourself

>>2810668

yes, that Bangladesh and Pakistan used to be Indian too.

>>2816067
not true at all

>>2816090
>used to be

They still are. That whole area is rightful Indian clay

>>2817528
the majority of pakis are indic (i.e. everyone but the pashtuns, kalash and balochis + hazaras)

>>2809692
As opposed to Indian Nationalism which is just progressivist nonsense formulated by british aligned pro colonialist who had to switch their tone to remain in power to changed their muslim names to hindu ones and ruled india under the name of Gandhi and Nehru? Yea much better...

>>2809375
>That's sort of the point of aggrandizing propaganda and exaggeration.
You know this because you lived there mr vampire? If not how can you be so absolute about this?

>>2817535
>(i.e. everyone but the pashtuns, kalash and balochis + hazaras)
>implying afghanis are even people
>rejecting civilization for rustic dwelling in the mountains
>hiding your kids and your wife while the mullah gets you killed
You are right they are subhumans.

>>2817825
mad? shitskin poo paki who thinks he's different from poo in loo indians

go take a look at your DESIGNATED face in the mirror and cry lel

>>2809260
The 3/4 of the mongol turned muslim. The 1/4th became Buddhist.

It would've been 1/4 buddhist 2/4 muslim 1/4 buddhist/christian had Berke not betrayed his mongol heritage for muh allah feelings.

>>2809041
Sounds like typical islamic rhetoric to me.

>>2808934
Im an Indian, dont agree with the politics of any party and am neither Hindu nor Muslim. Now please tell me why I still find this stuff to be utter garbage?

Its not like I havent tried to understand it from your perspective either. But all the sources that 'prove' your points always lead to questionable sources or are made by modern pseudo-intellectuals with clear political viewpoints.

I agree that Tamerlane attacked India with the intention of looting and sacking it and I wont deny the atrocities he commited especially in Delhi and Meerut. But suggesting that it was a war he waged against the hindu community is naïve, had it been under muslim rule Im sure he would have attacked anyways. Its our netas and especially our current media which shows clear political bias that keeps pushing one or the other side of this agenda.

If you can provide sources for what you have written. Ones that provide a clearly unbiased viewpoint only concentrating on historical fact and not on a hindu vs muslim historical narrative, then I am willing to accept everything you have stated

>>2809027
How did they explain how Islam came to India?

>>2809113
Because Islam

>>2809375
>That's sort of the point of aggrandizing propaganda and exaggeration.

so on one hand the muslim rulers thought bragging about wholesale massacre would be "aggrandizing" i.e. something positive, and on the other hand they dindu nuffin, religion of peace etc.?

>>2809702
>It's 2017, there is no objective reality, if Hindu nationalists want to believe that Indo-Europeans are native to India and that the Vedas have a greater awareness of the natural world than modern science, that is just fine. The grand metanarratives of progress are dead anyway.
t. alexander dugin

File: PakEthnicities.jpg (268KB, 1014x972px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 1014x972px

>>2817535
Indic is not a thing you dense piece of shit.

There are real ethnic groups with real names. You cannot arbitrarily pick and chose different ethnic groups and call them "indic" just because you want to be a parasite on Punjabi and Sindhi identities.

>>2809041
lol I knew the hajis were capable of some hivemind tier amnesia but holy shit my man

I read somewhere that the muslims don't believe their space rock was ever destroyed, even though it has been destroyed before or something like that, can anyone confirm this?

File: Based Kindom Come.png (54KB, 201x211px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 201x211px

>>2809409
>>2809543
>>2809545
fucking savages, more demon than human

>>2822213
>can anyone confirm this?

It's true

File: remus-cernea.jpg (23KB, 402x404px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 402x404px

>>2813964
i've seen secularists suck muslim dick as well.

>>2816090
They still are, they are just indian muslims

>>2822213
It has been destroyed, rebuilt and renovated multiple times as per Islamic history and various wars between different Islamic empires.

>>2815553
>t.newfag
It's not even new faggot

Do people posting here know the difference between Hindus and Sikhs

>>2809784
>>2809733
So what's up with their obsession with conversion? Their main aim was to spread islam and convert every infidel. It's not like they were on a Field trip.

>>2809971
>are located in Pakistan.
You mean north-west india?

ITT: Indian-Paki shitflinging

>>2821044
The dindu nuffin thing from muslims is very recent, they usually take pride in raping and pillaging, even today when there are no leftists to taqqiya around they will gladly tell you about the 'conquest' of ther ancestors

Not historically accurate at all. Mahmud of Ghazni's atrocities are recognized to be exaggerated, and the Muslim invaders that preceded and followed him were fairly benevolent.

And if it were true, who gives a shit t b h? Cultures do horrendous shit all the time, always have, are right now, and always will. If the Medieval Muslims in India were more brutal than any others, then they should get a shiny trophy.

File: wojak islamic.jpg (36KB, 427x461px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 427x461px

>>2824798
Dindu nuffin is a western liberal Muslim meme, Im proud of the fact that we conquer and butcher your disgusting toiletless civilisation

Only cucks are ashamed of the glory of their ancestors

>>2824982
Why do you chimp out when white people take pride in crusades and colonization then?

>>2825012
I don't. But don't you think an Indian would react the same to us saying we would conquer and genocide them again the same way we did when Bush said he would start a crusade against us?

>>2826045
>crusade
>bush
>genocide
You're going a bit far there

>>2817939
>mad?
Mad about what? I dont envy you having zero civilization and being bombed everyday by americans, I encourage your degeneracy.

>>2817939
Literally not true at all

>>2824300
Hindu nuffin

>>2808934
>>2808942
>>2808948
>>2808963
>>2808967
Subhanallah!

I unironically believe that Pakistan should also implement the forced conversions of Hindus. After all if India doesn't allow Muslims to legally practice their faith then why should Pakistan?

>>2809733
>What's up with calling every invasion and/or massacre Holocaust?
Holocaust
1. Destruction or slaughter on a mass scale, especially caused by fire or nuclear war.

>>2828413
>indian constitution literally says that they are a secular republic.
>muzzies have all the rights in the world and have their barbaric customs enshrined in law.
truly oppressed

>>2828918
>Can't sacrifice cows on Eid day
>Can't give the call to Prayer
>All rights

Yeah and our constitution also promises freedom of religion. We'll keep the clause whilst killing all these Kaffirs.

File: 1494282647561.jpg (61KB, 959x960px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 959x960px

>>2809054
>>2809113
>>2809409
>Persian/Central Asian/Paki invaders depicted as darker and more oriental than the Indians they conquered

hahahahahaahahahahaaaa

File: Unlabeled_Renatto_Luschan_Skin_color_map.svg.png (237KB, 1500x586px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 1500x586px

>>2829229

>>2829179
>Can't give the call to Prayer

idiot, I'm sure you can still give the call. It's just that you don't get to use a massive loudspeaker on the tallest structure in town, you just have to actually yell really loud or something.

Not entirely unreasonable, you're just autistic.

File: Prime_Minister_Narendra_Modi_at_the_300th_Shaheedi_Samagam_of_Baba_Banda_Singh_Bahadur_in_New_Delhi.jpg (514KB, 1479x1050px) Image search: [Google]

514KB, 1479x1050px

>>2829229

>>2829253
Yeah and not being allowed to sacrifice cows is absolutely Secular

>>2829179
Jews can't sacrifice chickens in a lot of European countries either

>>2808934
Yeah. Islam sucks. Always has. Always will.

>>2825012
We don't, of course we see them as enemies, but a respectable one, a crusader chanting Deus Vult is not so different from Jihadist chanting Takbir or the Japanese Samurai praising their emperor, all are warriors of faith and I respect them more than leftist liberals

>>2829510
Thats because of the method NOT the animal. So the reasoning is secular. In India cow slaughter is only prohibited for Religious reason or else the slaughter of ALL animals should be banned or have regulations.

File: 1492689076478.png (977KB, 595x845px) Image search: [Google]

977KB, 595x845px

>>2809041

>>2829739
NOT FOR RELIGIOUS REASONS

Did you even read what I said? They do not ban meat they simply ban the method of the slaughter on secular basis whereas beef and mutton is legal in the entire sane world.

India claims to be secular yet it has banned the slaughter of cows totally without any Secular backing.

Please stop LARPing as secular.

>>2829719
So what? not sacrificing cows is hardly equivalent to forced conversion. The first isn't inherently an anti-blasphemy measure while the other decisively is.

>>2829781
Most places also ban polygamy for essentially religious reasons. No nation is perfectly secular, and its laws will tend to cleave to the dominant religious position. India is a lot more secular than it used to be, and a lot more secular than many other republics in the region.

File: 1495017426628.jpg (643KB, 1273x1273px) Image search: [Google]

643KB, 1273x1273px

>>2810668
>South Asia used to have 0 Muslims
>Now there are 500 million Muslims in South Asia
>B-but there are still Hindus in India so clearly Muslims dindu nuffing

Kys my nigga

>>2809113

Islam creates a very toxic society, where every muslim is submitted to emotional and physical abuse since they are young, therefore they develop personality disorders like narcissism, psychopathy and borderline personality disorders. These are all disorders caused by extreme abuse and they can't feel empathy even if they try

File: image.jpg (39KB, 600x375px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 600x375px

>>2829832

>>2808934
>people conquer some other people
>people get raped and stuff gets broken
wow, surely this is the fault of islam

>>2829809
>South Asia used to have 0 Hindus
>Now there are 1B Hindus

You can go back as far as you want it doesn't change a thing

Muslim here, Bangladesh in nationality. I'd renounce Islam, but I'd probably die, kek. I think if you give it a couple hundred years, Islam will weaken to enough so that it is similar to present day Christianity. Religion is a natural human disease, if you killed everyone on this planet except for a man and woman, reset their memories, surely we'll be worshipping idols again at some point, and then monotheism would pop up too. I don't see why if Islam didn't exist, that then some other barbaric religion would have just risen up instead from the middle east at the same time period. Would it really have made a difference if Tamerlane of the Timurid empire was a Muslim or not? People do what they want at the end of the day, depending on the culture they were raised in. Religion is a supplement to their culture to justify their actions, whether those actions are good or bad.

>>2829863
>taking it to an extreme is fine
You know mehmed only gave a days looting in Constantinople

File: 1493165031762.gif (2MB, 500x391px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x391px

>>2829867
Yes, there was a time where there were 0 Hindus in India, and all of India probably had a few tens of thousands of people in total. But when the Muslims first arrived at the shores of Sind in the 800s, there were already tens of millions of Hindus, Buddhists and Jains on the Indian subcontinent. If Muslims did not convert a huge chunk of the local population, then today there should only be a very, very small minority of Muslims compared to the native Hindu population. But that's not the case is it?

Forced conversions occurred everywhere Islamic conquests set foot. India is no exception. The vast majority of Muslims on the Subcontinent are descended from Hindus, Jains and Buddhists no matter how hard they try to LARP as Persians, Arabs, Turks, etc

>>2829794
First of all forced conversion isn't an anti blasphemy measure.

Second of all Hindus deserve it.

Thirdly, /pol/ has been calling for ethnic cleansing for years now and everybody is okay with it. But if I call for forced conversions then all hell breaks loose. After all religion is a choice unlike race

>>2828413
>implying they don't establish their parallel monocultural society anyway
muslims are disdained for the same reason jews are- they don't assimilate, flaunt it, and are hostile to the other.

>>2829863
Raping and looting done by soldiers in newly conquered cities happened everywhere but it was only done by soldiers as the city was actually taken

Systematically doing it for years was not common.

>>2810765
>denying facts
http://www.nature.com/news/ancient-civilization-cracking-the-indus-script-1.18587

>>2809213

> implying the Persians didn't build the Hebrew Temples

> implying the Iranians didn't used a Semitic language as a ligua franca

>>2809213

This piece of art

>>2831457
>Iranians didn't used a Semitic language as a ligua franca

huh

>>2829934
>The vast majority of Muslims on the Subcontinent are descended from Hindus, Jains and Buddhists no matter how hard they try to LARP as Persians, Arabs, Turks, etc
My family was Sikh desu

>>2831242
It absolutely is an anti-blasphemy measure as in ensuring there are no blasphemous religions dimwit, and lmao at the whataboutism, which is also wrongly grounded as I was never ok with /pol/'s ethnic cleansing when they are semi serious. Just like you are semi serious now.
Hope india tears off yet another seperatist region from pakistan if pakistan is filled with people like you.

>>2808934
Any good books on this?
>>2809041
Sounds exactly what Islam is doing or would be doing today if they had the power to do so.

>>2829781
no dumbass, I get beef right across the street in India. Different states have different laws regarding cow slaughter. Places like Kerala have beef as an integral part of their diet even for brahmins.

And halal meat is extremely common in india. The only jhatka meat (stun and kill) is generally available in Punjab.

India still remains one of th ehighest beef exporters in the world because it is profitable to sell bovines off after they become old.

>>2831242
the only choice a pakis should have is Sarin or Chlorine

File: akhandbharat.png (687KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

687KB, 1024x1024px

>>2831242
>Second of all Hindus deserve it.
I wish you had the guts to back this up. India is still 80% hindu, if you really believed what you said you will be up there doing what you preach, but then again some inbred muslim faggot is probably too brain damaged to understand much of anything more than spewing nonsense he heard at his madrassa funded by Saudis who literally call you dogs for being non arabs.

Plus you are a paki, you literally dont matter, so might as well kill yourself to save yourself from barking like the dog you are. :D

>>2832713
Please don't include southeast Asia as India

>>2832718
Kill all your muslims and I will not include SEA.

No muslims, no problem.

>>2832713
>wanting to assimilate gorrillions of pakis with polio into india
please no. Independence let us excise the cancer for the most part. Everything west of the thar is a tumor

>>2809451
This is where you should be offered multiple different interpretations.

File: image.gif (2MB, 294x270px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 294x270px

>>2832713
>greater india
>includes canada, england

>>2832753
>falling for bait this loaded

>>2832722
>assimilate
naw convert or die mate. Optionally you can be pagans if white. No cross or crescent.

>>2813943
Anatolian Greeks were not assimilated. They were mixed with Turkmens and created the Turks of Anatolia
see: Turcopoles, Mixovarvaroi etc

same "muslims" mongols ran a train all over the middle east earlier killing 2/3 of the population
that's mongols for you
deal with it
shit happenes

>>2833110
Not true

>>2808934
Assuming this is historically correct, how can you call it an "Islamic Holocaust" if it was commited by a particular subgroup that only used the religion to justify its political ends and could have done so with any other religion? Do you have some sort of agenda associating it to the religion rather than the state that took these actions? Is a faith's entire reputation based on a group? Invading a land 17 times to pillage and enslave is hardly an effort to spread one's faith, when the faith's original goal was to be embraced by the conquered peoples, as was the case in the Arabian victories against the byzantines and the persians.
If you are still convinced it is an "Islamic holocaust", then present your arguments.

File: 1487015464548.jpg (28KB, 500x555px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 500x555px

>>2809324
yeah islam is shit and muslims play this game all day listen how buttmad this muslim "scholar" is about mongolian attacks on muslims, and most of these claims are hilariously outlandish

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJqk8-GWBkU

Tbh they probally did India a favour. They should have went further so India would be less populated.

>>2835470
>supporting muslims.
You dirty pseudo muslim go bury your head in the sand facing mecca you traitor to humanity.

>>2835363
Except most khanates became muslim and then proceeded to rape India. You forgot that part, poo.

>>2808967
>Mohammadans

We need to go back to calling mudslimes this. They don't follow Islam, they follow Mohammad the pedophile butcher.

>>2835482
>supporting poos

Go put some fair and lovely on so you can attempt to gain my white skin.

>>2809626
Sheer numbers, also the Khuraj and other discriminatory taxation making so the rulers didn't want to convert them all.
>remember Bangladesh and Pakistan are 200 million people each, with India having 200 muslims as well, compared with about 1 billion Hindus

>>2832713
No Mauritius, Reunion, Trinidad or Bali?

>>2835487
The equivalent of Mussulman is used in some languages.

>>2832713
Greater india planned when there is china in the north. Kek. Poos are always delusional.

>>2832720
Kek and yet u include the uae, pakistan, kuwait and afghanistan. Make up your fkn mind pajeet.

>>2835487
It's a personality cult

>>2815426
top kek m8. you're in every thread about india. why are you so obsessed with us?

>>2815502
So the two most hardy groups are the ones in the path of invasions? Really cajoles my cashews.

>>2836672
>Kek and yet u include the uae, pakistan, kuwait and afghanistan.
Well as I said no muslims no problem, if they wont move they will be removed.

>>2835492
>can attempt to gain my white skin.
Being a muslim is irredeemable, white or not.

>>2835735
China is a paper tiger. Kek chinks are so delusional, open your eyes!

>>2837692
Better than India though

>>2837690
>Poo aknowledges my superiority based on skin color.

Stay a slave race, poo.

>>2837753
You know how much melanin is worth, right?

File: zimbabwe-banknotes-10-trillion-front.jpg (1MB, 1748x856px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1748x856px

>>2839371
A bag of rice, perhaps.

>>2832713
kek there is no muslims in Vietnam. Bruh chill

File: db.jpg (108KB, 660x539px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 660x539px

>>2839984
There is
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chams

>>2837753
>Thinking you are better because of light brown skin
>have to depend on euros and their acheivments for a dirty Muslim to roleplay as white
You are pretty pathetic and the only slave is your own mind to your delusion. Have fun being a nobody IRL

>>2837708
Yea gutter oil and pseudo commies will feed and make you a super power.

>>2840182
dey nice doe

File: mZm7T4c.png (499KB, 650x367px) Image search: [Google]

499KB, 650x367px

>>2809041
>>2808934
>>2808942
>>2808948
>mfw the mudslimes were so horrible in India that an entire religion was invented just to deal with them

>>2808942
>>2808948
This confirms my beliefs that Arabs simply aren't human beings. They are the literal Amalekites the Old Testament speaks of. They only seek to destroy.

>>2841937
We call them Mohammedans now

File: an1t9utxyaey.jpg (34KB, 640x625px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 640x625px

>>2809027
wew. this is a history board, pls read some history. to help you out https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mughal_Empire (notice the borders of the last Indian state before British rule). then read https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_of_India

>>2810049
Not him, but gonna need some proof why the Muslims nea India then aren't behaving the same way as they do now (i.e. iprisoning and beating up other faiths, death penalty for different religions, etc.)

>>2810668
>Germans brutally murdered Jews
>There's still a lot of Jews

>Turks genocided Armenians like no tomorrow
>There's still a lot of Armenians.

Who would have thought that after a few hundred years the Hindu population would have recovered again ?

>>2841937
You do realize these guy's were Turk's right?

>>2811909
The only people obsessed with being 'cucked' are losers wew

>>2829856
>He never had to live near muslims
he's right about everything

File: 1490969222294.gif (2MB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x400px

>mfw turks rape the shit out of eurasia
>mfw this gets pushed to all muslims

>>2809571
It was mainly Berke/Golden Horde betraying the Ilkhanate that effectively destroyed mongol unity.

Chagatai were neutral and weren't really a Muslim fanatic. With the duplicity of Golden Horde, the Ilkhanate successors converted to Islam because of their failure to eradicate the Mamluks(as the Golden Horde was helping them).

I have a feeling like these accounts are often exaggerated to some extents to justify later retaliations on Islamic communities. Not that Islamic invasions couldn't be brutal, but all invasions are. After the invasions, tensions between the Islamic community and the Hindu community were largely peaceful during the Mughal period.

>>2808934
shit happens bro.

>>2808967
>“Hindus are like the mud; if silver is demanded from them, they must with the greatest humility offer gold. If a Mohammadan desires to spit into a Hindu’s mouth, the Hindu should open it wide for the purpose. God created the Hindus to be slaves of the Mohammadans. The Prophet hath ordained that, if the Hindus do not accept Islam, they should be imprisoned, tortured, finally put to death, and their property confiscated.”

They hindu nuffin

>>2829794
People literally being burned alive because they are suspected of transporting cows to slaughter.

India will always be a 3rd world shit hole Pajeet.

File: 35073773c7f33f89891286d22d24eeb0_fresh-outta-hecks-to-give-steven-universe-know-your-meme-sunglasses-meme-face_900-677[1].jpg (48KB, 900x677px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 900x677px

>>2841859
>just to deal with them

Manipulated by the Brits like none other.
Lost most of their lands to Muslims, including their holy capital Lahore
Used like cannon fodder

>>2842328
That's not what he meant you fucking contrarian.
There had always been a separation of a Muzies and Hindus since the Muslim invasions.
The fucking Muslims did it themselves. The Brits just perfected it.

Either Muslim apologist or a mudshit. Either way, end yourself.

>>2845635
>Manipulated by the Brits like none other.
>Lost most of their lands to Muslims, including their holy capital Lahore
>Used like cannon fodder
This is before then you dunce. They managed to beat the Afghans and secure an empire over the Punjab region.

File: IMG_8954.jpg (62KB, 322x279px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 322x279px

>Only 20% of the world's 1.6 billion Muslims live in the Middle East
>Fucking 1.6 billion
Where the fuck do the other 80% live?

>>2847638
Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, India