what is the main reason in your opinion
physical strength
women are useless
Men who achieve nothing in their life place themselves on the same "side" as people from history and then they use it as an excuse to look down on women because people from their "side" don't accomplish as much.
because pregnancy
>>2806272
Literally this. Women are child bearers who spend most of their time taking care of the children. Men are the only ones who do all the other tasks.
>>2806225
Women are stupid animals.
Women are a meme
whoever coordinated the hunts probably garnered the most respect as a leader of the tribe
>>2806276
bit of an exaggeration, men had a strong familial role at rearing offspring in most tribal societies
Edgelord answer appropriate for 4chan: I genuinely now suspect women are just dangerous for civilization if they are not under some sort of control. Every culture eventually learns this lesson.
In older more feminist days I would have thought it might be because of mammalian instinctual habits to trend towards male dominated harems. Or an emergent property of a power positive feedback loop from the physical strength in men. Or maybe a need for men to guarantee assurance of parentage (still believe this one).
But now, now I see that female sexuality can be toxic as fuck. It's maladaptive to civilization. There's reason serial killers on death row, the worst of humanity, have adoring female fan clubs and it's not because women have well tuned instincts. Women also tend to be terrible leaders, politically, intellectually, and culturally. They have terrible conflict resolution skills compared to men. Give them too much power where they're selecting mates and making important civil decisions and chaos follows.
>>2806369
nice pathetic, generic, copypasted opinion about things you're clueless about there.
4chan appropriate indeed
>>2806385
Say what you will, but it ain't copy and pasted from anything.
>>2806225
consider 3 tribes
one in which the men hunt and the women gather and raise the kids
on in which the women hunt and the men gather and raise the kids
and one in which there are no gender roles
if there is some disaster and many of the hunters die, most probably a war, the patriarchial society fairs best.
in a patrarchial society teh tribes ability to reproduce is not threatened, there are still just as many women having children
in the matriarchail society its ability to reproduce itself is significantly weakened as less women means less babies, and if these women also have to fight being pregnant is kind of a problem
the third society fares better than a matriarchal society but still not as well as the patrachial one as women still die.
this is why a lot of the early civilizations, especially greece, were so super patriarchial, they essentially considered women baby machines and so could create surplus population to start you know, building civilization rather than just being hunter gatherers.