Are western armies scared to wage war in Africa. Aside from South Africa, I don't know of a single major war waged in Africa by a western army.
On the flip side, Africans or their diaspora have fought in major wars on almost every major continent.
>>2801028
War is a big investment, it can't repay itself in Africa.
>>2801028
>I don't know of a single major war waged in Africa by a western army.
The worldwars?
>>2801039
This. We already prop up states that are having mass famine because the population growth is unsustainable. Africa is a hell hole and peace would be only temporary on top of nothing to gain.
>>2801045
Those were peripheral battles.
I mean a war centered in the dark heart.
>>2801028
The Somalia and French interventions beg to differ.
But, like most potential interventions, why bother?
All those wars where they conquered the continent.
If you're talking about modern examples, then they intervene in civil wars all the time; Sierra Leone (e.g. Polliser), Libya (e.g. Odyssey Dawn), Mali (e.g. Serval), Somalia (e.g. Mogadishu and OEF-HA), and Congo (e.g. Jadotville) just to name a few.
The french are CONSTANTLY mucking about in Africa even in the present day.
>>2801072
Name the wars in which they conquered the continent. I would love to hear about them.
Those more recent interventions are more like Ops, not full scale wars.
>>2801086
They send detachments down there, essentially for the experience, so their armed forces don't become entirely inexperienced in modern warfare.
>>2801053
>We already prop up states that are having mass famine because the population growth is unsustainable
The famine isn't because of population growth at all if you actually bother to research it at all.
>>2801059
Only the north african campaign was peripheral
The other campaigns were just as much in the "dark heart" as the boer wars