Are race and superior genetics historically correct? Why are

Races are developed based on the environments they evolved in, since we separated from a common ancestor. This confers advantages within those terrains our ancestors lived on. Both physical and mental traits are collectively observable, which contribute to culture - and are the basis for it.

You can choose to apply some kind of 'superiority' and 'inferiority' to it, but as is the case with nature, there is no such thing as moral or ranking judgement.

File: IMG_1161.jpg (82KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 640x360px

>>2783524
Wordy nonsense.

WTF are you thinking?

You got shot for brains.

could a race realist explain to me what's the point or purpose of determining which race is superior? like how would you use that knowledge to improve society

File: 1489075292255.jpg (36KB, 570x427px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 570x427px

>>2783975
It's nonsense to you because you're not able to grasp simple concepts

>>2783511
Races are absolutely real, but superiority/inferiority are kind of a meme, it's too relative. Basically a nigger is inferior to a white man in an industrialized society but in a pre-technological hunter gatherer world the nigger is better adapted for survival.

>>2784287
Ironically the Soviets made this poster around the same time when they were themselves colonizing Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Just ask the Tajiks or the Estonians.