Monarchy

File: 1492413535617.jpg (108KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 1280x720px

>>2781526
>i want monarchy to be ideal state in my mind but i don't acually believe it is, support my wishful thinking pls
Clear the mess in your head first then come back.

>>2781545
It feels natural to me

But I don't know the legitimate reasons why some people believe in it so passionately

>>2781526
Because monarchy means stability, it stops populism and reactionary politics

>>2781600
Is this the reason why democracy is a failed concept?

>>2781526
It's essential to have strong authoritarian rule to control such big nations like Russia for example

File: so stable.gif (36KB, 486x1149px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 486x1149px

>>2781600
> monarchy means stability

>>2781650
How many of this destroyed the country, genuinely asking

File: burgundy-summary.gif (62KB, 521x512px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 521x512px

>>2781674
Probably, not that much, but monarchies were destroyed left and right in their times. There is no way around that.

>>2781600
It's viable and ideal in a society where wealth is based off of rent and where authorities man government has a solid tradition and repesesntion in culture. Post napoleonic France is a good case study.

The other question you need to answer. Is how this form of government will be put into place - otherwise your just as idealistic as a commie

>>2781600
>>2781650
Modern, constitutional monarchies are more better than republics. Since a president in most countries (that don't have a presidential system like the US) is basically a monarch with limited reign. Said presidents can have more power than a monarch by working with their political party, but that causes lots of issues, like the PM being a spineless bitch who listens to the president, thus giving the president power beyond his constitutional powers.
A monarch eliminates the threat of political bias between the president and pm.

Capitalism delivered a fatal blow to absolute monarchy more than 200 years ago. The old regime is never coming back.

If you live in a constitutional monarchy you can still jerk off to royal families and pretend they hold some political relevance.

>>2781705
>nce a president in most countries (that don't have a presidential system like the US) is basically a monarch with limited reign. Said presidents can have more power than a monarch by working with their political party, but that causes lots of issues, like the PM being a spineless bitch who listens to the president, thus giving the president power beyond his constitutional powers.

Or it could be like in most constitutional monarchies were the monarch has such a lack of hard power or comparative wealth they become spineless and rubber stamp everything out of a fear that the parliament will boot them out.