Why do anglofags call him gerbles?

File: 1493807328635.jpg (353KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

353KB, 800x800px

>>2772572
U mad?

>>2772578
It's just so stupid. Even historians pronounce his name like that. Like when they say "nucular". There's no R in his name.

>>2772572
the english rhotacized schwa is probably the closest english approximate of the german vowel represented by oe

I thought they call him Gobels. And Fuhrer like Few-rer.

File: Screen Shot 2017-05-07 at 16.34.10.png (189KB, 931x540px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 931x540px

it's genuinely upsetting

>>2772586
But why not say gebles pronouncing the G in the same way gas is said? that's more acceptable to me than gerbles

>>2772586
maybe in bonglish it is. in american english, "gebbles" is a lot closer.

>>2772572

I pronounce it Go-bells, probably not quite right but he's only a German so getting his name wrong is my prerogative.

>>2772585

No one except retards say "nucular".

>>2772625
that's correct.
>>2772615
I've never heard anyone say Jerbils, if they do that's just dead wrong.

>>2772647
I know my phrasing implies Jerbils but I meant something different. Gerbels by itself is just dead wrong isn't it?

>>2772640
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucular
Ike and Carter used it

>>2772666
for Americans yeah. the way british people would say it is actually pretty close to the original

This is an example of how they pronounce both Fuehrer and Goebbels

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZlFBSRrSR0

The cartoon version is much worse. They actually sing "foorer's face"

>>2772676
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucular

Exactly, like I said, retards i.e. Americans.

File: 3.jpg (184KB, 960x413px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 960x413px

>>2772680
so you pronounce Goebbels as if you're actually gargling? ironic

>>2772705
if you want to be accurate, no.