Georgia Guidestones

I dunno man can't really argue against any of that shit can you. The rich will probably start culling us all within our lifetime to achieve it.

9/10

I didn't even know this thing existed, but 9/10.

>>2769124
They better get on it.

The poor are awakening. Really awakening. The internet changed the whole fucking game.

Sounds like NWO type crap. Fuck off psychic vampires.

>>2769142
What?

>>2769142
Your joke went right over my head.

File: Ted_Turner_LF.jpg (43KB, 522x647px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 522x647px

>>2769142
>implying Ted Turner isn't a Democrat

>>2769142
Fuck off leftypol

>>2769113
>Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
No progress/10. That's the population of Europe, too few. And if it's a constitution of one government, then how is it supposed to enforce this, via war?

>Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
Too vague. And how do you improve divestity by guiding reproduction? Anyway, with genetic editing we'll be able to do whatever we want.

>Unite humanity with a living new language.
It has no literature, no culture, nothing. Why not just use English?

>Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
Too vague.

>Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
Great, how didn't we think of that before! 10/10, this way the constitution straight up prohibits unfair laws and unjust courts!

>Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
And the judges are... Oh right, they should be are just and fair. Of course.

>Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
Sure. Actually, why not just have one ruler?

>Balance personal rights with social duties.
Thanks for reminding, we'd never do that if you haven't told us.

>Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
Sure.

>Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.
We are a part of nature.

>>2769268

>That's the population of Europe, too few

That's the population of europe in the 21st century, why do you think that we must always have atleast that many people in Europe? Because the big bankers wouldn't make much money with less?

>We are a part of nature.

So are locusts until they bocame too many and eat all the plants, which is what you are doing now.

>>2769113
>Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
Absurdly restrictive.
>Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
I support this.
>Unite humanity with a living new language.
With English, we don't need a new one.
>Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
wat
>Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
Because courts have protected international disputes so well in the past, kek.
>Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
See above.
>Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
Noise ordinances are nice.
>Balance personal rights with social duties.
These aren't mutually exclusive upon each other.
>Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
Truth, sure, but fuck you, I'm an ugly virgin, I hope the Turks genocide you guys again.
>Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.
Resources exist to be consumed, and consumed they must be.

>>2769113
this was made by a guy who got bowled over my kahlil gibran's the prophet

File: 1492728452335.jpg (44KB, 638x640px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 638x640px

>>2769113
>Balance personal rights with social duties.

Pretty vague. Should be obvious enough from perusing this board that there is no consensus on what this entails.

>>2769113
>Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
That relates to America, not the fucking planet you Infowarrior lying faggot.

>>2769268
>That's the population of Europe, too few.

The vast majority of people alive do not contribute in any meaningful way to human progress

File: 1493540699998.png (12KB, 243x243px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 243x243px

>>2769113
So how exactly would this "World Court" function?

>>2769113
It was a good LARP.

yfw conspiracy theorist monkeys deface this constantly out of misguided butthurt

>>2772250
>t. edgy NEET who has no idea how society functions
Everyone who works contributes to human progress. A Chinese farmer, an Indian programmer, a Malaysian tailor, an African immigrant janitor in France, each one of them contributes more to our progress than you.

>>2769136
So did the magna carta, and the formation of republics and the rifle. The elite tend to find loopholes and mean of control of all of these systems though. [spoiler]They are usually the creator or beneficiary[/spoiler]

>>2769113
10/10 delusional
8/10 vague

>>2772019
plus it implies a lack of understanding of the nature of law. Rights entail duties. Where an entity has legal or moral rights, some other entity or entities, whether individual persons or the state, have legal duties or moral obligations to act or forebear from action in the the interest of the entity which holds the right. Rights without duties is impossible.

>>2772064
>direct quotation
>all other points talk about humanity as a whole and at no point even use the word America
Sure thing kiddo

>>2769113
Clearly written by a retarded hippie faggot.
Vague "common sense" bullshit with no sense of how to implement it.

>seek harmony with the infinite and leave room for nature
>but eugenics is totally a-ok

>Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
>Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
pick one faggot

>invent a new language for the hell of it when letting currently existing languages evolve is perfectly fine already
No.