I heard fight threads are the trend now.

>>2768089
what am I supposed to do here OP?
you need a strawpoll or something

>>2768089
>apache
>not the superior plains nigger tribe the Comanche

>>2768121
http://www.strawpoll.me/12908810
>apache
>vs
>zulu

OP, you need to clarify what era of Apache.

Because the 1880s era Apache had guns and they were good at using them.

If we assume it's the latest iteration of apache before they got put on the reservations, they're going to win the Tourny no contest.

>>2768144
Feel free to insert them if you wish
>>2768185
Sorry. Pre-colonialism.

>>2768210
Okay, then the Zulu win because they have ironworking and a lot of dudes.

this is retarded what's the point of placing all these tribes like Zulus there? any actual state would steam roll them

>>2768231
Ehh, the British actually struggled with them.

Even so, the individual brackets are fun on their own.

>>2768231
All OP did was turn 10-20 threads into one. Chill

>>2768089
>Wallachia vs Byzantium (peak)
Yeah good idea, next time make Australian aborigines vs USA (peak).

>>2768577
Vlad Era Wallachia was basically the same time Byzantium was dying. It's fair.

>>2768594
Yes, but at its peak Byzantium was incredibly strong, and the difference in techs can't make up for it, Wallachian army didn't use a lot of firearms.

File: 1494097231804.png (33KB, 1677x649px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 1677x649px

5 minutes in Paint
The Byzantium vs Ming was hard
Byzantium would win simply by Ming imploding after a few years marching across Asia and battling byzantium

>>2768661
I think OP meant the classic deadliest warrior 5v5

>>2768869
I don't think the Ottomans existed in 1400.

>>2768878
They already conquered nearly all of the Byzantine Empire by 1400

>>2768883
You're right, I'm dumb.

>>2768869
The Byzantine vs. Ming scenario is interesting enough that that we need a lot more detail.

>>2768901
OP here.
I intended this thread to be pretty chill on details and have folks figure the rules out themselves.

That said country vs country and 10v10 were the two concepts I was picturing.

>>2768924
I was picturing that both of them suddenly get their countries put next to each other, and filled with an insatiable lust for the other countries blood.

File: 1461042972151.jpg (68KB, 480x600px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 480x600px

>>2768869
>Scotland beats Korea

I'm not a weeb but Korea at that time was more technologically advanced and had more people.

And Scotland beating Ethiopia (1400) is also absurd.

>>2768312
>Ehh, the British actually struggled with them.
Not really.

>>2768934
>the landmasses of Byantium and Ming China both propel towards each other at mach 2
>the resulting earthquakes, mountains, and infrastructural devastation cause both countries to collapse causing max max tier skrimishes bewteen the 2 former nations to take place in the mountains and gullies bewteen the 2 nations
>tsunamis ravage the western US seaboard and Japan gets ALANTIS'D
>the Med.sea, Black sea, Caspain sea is moved about 200 miles west, causing massive flooding.

>>2768992
Kek

>>2768869
> incans beating tibet

>>2768942
> 1,902 killed
That's a lot for spearmen

>>2768144
Were they actually better?

>>2768939
this

>>2768869
Lol what? How would Byzantium beat a 1400 Ottomans? Ottomans were wrecking Byzantines as early as 1300, and the Byzantines peaked at 526 - 566, they were so behind technologically and population wise it wouldn't even be a competition.

>>2770683
They'd lose the 10v10 too?

>>2768089
>Round 1

>Apache V. Zulu
Assuming it's post-Contact, Apache.

>Incans V. Tibetans
Bit of a tough one, but I'm going to say Tibetans simply because they faced off against much more mature culture she in war, and had iron.

>Japan V. Mali
Japan obviously.

>Vikings V. Ayutthaya
Vikings. Like Islam, the total Viking control of the sea means that they'll quickly come to dominate in Malayasia and Indonesia and be able to strike with impunity.

>Scotland V. Korea
Korea. Better access to firearms.

>Vlad V. Byzantium
This is a retarded question. Byzantium.

>Hungary V. Morocco
Lol IDK. Hungary I guess

>Ottomans V. Loomen
Turks.


>Round 2
>Apache V. Aztec
Aztec.

>Ming V. Japan
Difficult to say. Probably Ming by sheer population, in a straight on fight.

>Ethiopia V. Korea
Korea.

>Venice V. Hungary
Venice, considering they BTFO the Hungarians so often, even when the Hungarians had friends helping.


>Round 3
>Aztec V. Tibet
Aztec. No iron, no concept of mountain fighting.

>Ming V. Vikings
Ming were pretty shit when it came to the sea. The Vikings could sail up the Yellow River and just kick their shit in. So Vikings.

>Korea V. Byzantium
Byzantium

>Venice V. Ottomans
Ottomans. Just too darned big.


>Round 4

>Tivet V. Ming
Ming.

>Byzantium V. Ottomans
Heh.


>Finale

Ottomans probably win.

autism