Whats the point of going to school to learn about history? It seems like you could learn it just as well by yourself if you're disciplined and you can focus on whatever you want stress-free.
>>2765216
sure, but schools might spark an interest in a subject that you otherwise might not be interested in learning about.
>>2765216
completely different beast
>>2765216
Depends on what you want out of it. If you want a piece of paper saying you've learned real good, go to school. If you just want to know a lot of cool shit, just read a bunch, listen to podcasts, and watch TV.
Nobody goes to school to "learn" you go to school because you get a document attesting that at least the bare minimum that is required for you to be considered a "professional" has been taught to you, and now you can take responsability for shit you say and do. I don't know how it works in burgerland but at least in the rest of the world if you are going to teach in a school you need to prove that you know how to teach history in a school, your bona fide word is just not enough. I understand how the case for some degree like History or other humanities might be or could be more flexible but if you are going to design something like a building or an oil refinery and you design it bad enough for something tragic to occur, than you can't just say "well bonkers good think I can't be held accountable since all I learned of engineering I learned from poignant YouTube channels".
At least where I live, a History course in an university is not about learning truuuuue history or becoming specialized in actual research on the subject but rather about learning a general overview of the western timeline and learning how to make fat stupid post-year-2000 brats learn that general overview
>>2765245
Where do I start then?