ANARCHISM - is it feasible?

>>2752860
If things are plentiful or in abundance then yes. We would also need to have a big change in philosophy and lifestyle.

>nothin personnel, kid: the ideology
Maybe if you're 14 lol

>>2752979
Who will protect my bumhole from the mob ;(

>>2752860
Anarchy is no government meaning humans doing whatever they want including raping any stupid female anarchist they see and killing anyone who tries to stop them. A real anarchy is no society at all humans living solitary lives where men rape any woman they find and thats it.

>>2752860
Personally no I just think it would not effective at combating state run organization.

>>2753082
Why the fascination with rape?

>>2753174
It's the biggest taboo of modern western society.

>>2753179
then how come we live in a rape culture?

>>2753188
Kek

>>2753038
Underrated

>>2752860
>what about security ( I've watched the walking dead!!).
Why do people only ever use fallacious arguments to criticize anarchism?

>>2753665
What's fallacious about being concerned over security under anarchy? Have you even read leviathan?

>>2753679
State security agents lose their jobs if they end up making the state too secure. It's a conflict of interest that inevitably leads to abuse. There are ways to address this even within a state, but it's simply unrealistic.

>>2753723
So why does that not apply to private security under anarchy?

My country was literally rated the safest country in the world this year. Police almost never abuse their power here. Corruption is very low. I feel safe here. Ironically enough there is a shortage of policemen right now because many are retiring.

>>2753038
>personnel

>>2753783
>So why does that not apply to private security under anarchy?
Because people would focus more on being their own security.

>My country was literally rated the safest country in the world this year.
If you live in a country where everybody is too cold to bother trying to kill each other, then it doesn't matter whether or not you have a state. Anarchism is about allowing for improvement whereas a state impedes improvement; the likelihood that any authority is absolute right is 0, so authority must always be questioned. And any authority that has been completely questioned is no longer necessary, because that means a non-coercive agreement has been realized.

>>2752860
It needs to be practiced as personal philosophy and when this is done collectively anarchistic acts will take place. It's not really an equivalent replacement to a democratic or capitalist system but more like another way of organizing to meet the needs of a group.

Not sure I explained that well but perhaps one of the most notable objections anarchists will have would be against the notion that (all) things need funding or a financial incentive to get done.