Who contributed less to humanity: Norse or North American Indians?

ur mum

The Canadians

well, the norse kinda gave us the normans

>>2747175
But Normans aren't Norse. Just thier posterity.

You, because you're wasting your time LARPing.

NAI, by a mile.

Norse were prolific traders, and sailed across the ocean. The new continent was given up on, until gold and civilization was found, far to the south. Norse vs. Aztecs would have garnered infinitely more (you)'s.

File: abo-oz.jpg (210KB, 618x425px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 618x425px

>>2747158
Abo's by a fucking landslide m8tey

The Norse gave us badass mythology.

>>2747158
North American Indians.

Corn and Tobacco.

Norse are just latecomer Germaniggers whom Frankish Europe subsequently converted.

>>2750241
>Tobacco and corn
>These did not exist if not for the indians

>>2750257
Don't know about tobacco but corn wouldn't. Fact is native americans contributed more significantly to domesticating plants vs the norse. In fact I can't think of any plant they domesticated.

>>2750257
Those are new world crops domesticated by the natives. So yes, they played a large part in its availability.

>>2747235
So? everything is somethings posterity

>>2750257
Corn did not exist in nature in the first place. It came out via selective breeding the same way breeds of dogs or horses came to.

In addition it was completely reliant on humans for survival. It is completely domesticated.