Is killing mentally ill and disabled ethical?

It's a slippery slope. You think it's alright to destory them because they can't provide for themselves, but over time it changes to anyone with any sort of defect. I know many people who have things like bipolar, or autism, or OCD and they're still pretty productive members of society.

I think it's awwww right. I think the Dutch and Swiss offer assisted suicide for the mentally ill.

>>2741177
There is no good reason why we shouldn't kill mentally retarded people. They're a waste of physical resources and a emotional strain on normal people.

No, killing a living person is immoral, even if it seems like a rational thing to do.
On the other hand, I unironically think to knowingly give birth to a disabled child is immoral too and the public opinion should be against it.

>>2741198
>irritates someone powerful
>someone knocks on your door days later
>Hi, I'm a psychiatrist and I have came to the conclusion that you're mentally disabled.

>>2741177
Did you see a video of yourself Anon?

>>2741246
This.

>>2741275
JOKE'S ON THEM

>>2741246
God created Every single life you edgy amoral teen

Depends on your ethics

>>2741198
if you're an adult and random retards are precipitating an emotional strain on you, focus on fixing yourself faggot

>>2741177
>Is killing Black people ethical
Slippery slope, OP

>>2741246
What exactly is difference between terminating a disabled child one day before birth or terminating a disabled child one day after birth?

>>2742441
None

>>2742316
Then he's really bad at it, especially for the all-good all-powerful entity.
>>2742441
>every abortion is a late-stage abortion
Nice strawman you've got here.

>>2742448
So why is killing a "living" person immoral even if its a rational thing but killing a living terminating a developed fetus ok?

>>2742456
So it's unethical to kill a fetus after a certian point? What point? and what if they don't know the fetus is disabled until late development?

>>2742463
I don't know, I'm not a doctor, I don't think there's a consensus on late-stage abortions.
This is red herring tho, you can determine most of the disabilities early on, and, in general, there is no need for a late-stage abortion to begin with.

>>2741177
There is no difference between killing them or abortions, so why not.

>>2742518
So why is killing a early stage fetus ok but killing a one day old child wrong?

>>2742552
Because its neurology isn't complex enough to feel pain?
Like, let's not make this into an abortion thread #1488, I know all your arguments as well as you know mine.

>>2742571
>Because its neurology isn't complex enough to feel pain?
That's not true. Early fetus feel more pain as they are more sensitivities.

>>2741177
In the future, you could identity bad genes in advance and either correct them in fetus or simply abort them.

It should be a crime to bring forth disabled people to life when we have the means to correct the mistake or try again without actually killing the person. Fetus does not have a personhood.

>>2742552
Early stage fetuses are just a clumps of cells.
They may feel pain, but so do fished clams.
I'd say that the difference betwen a clump of cells and a baby/comatose person is self-evident.

>>2742593
>*my pastor told me
I've almost forgotten it's daytime in the US.

>>2742672
Actually a nurse told me. Nice strawman though.

>>2742631
So what is the differnces between killing a fetus after 1 month vs 2 months vs 6 months? When exactly does it become a human?

>>2742688
>a nurse told me
I hope you're not serious.