According to international law, this wasn't a genocide because it targeted socio-economic groups and not religions, ethnicities or races.
>>2740869
So then the Holocaust wasn't one because Jews like to say they are not a race?
>>2740872
it was the killing of a culture, and thus an ethnicity
>>2740872
>>2740872
>OP lists three eligible traits: religion, ethnicity, or race
>"hurrdurr, let's ignore the other two and just focus on race"
dumb /pol/ poster
Also,
>12:38:46
>12:39:46
dumb samefagging poster
>>2740869
>international law
Implying it matters whatever that means. It's pretty much known about in the whole world as such and has received a lot more coverage by the infotainment media than the other lesser known genocide of the same period. And some of the perpetrators have recently been sentenced to live out the remainder of their lives behind bars now that they're old and grey as always.
https://youtu.be/AnZQgrmCP84
>>2740925
>Also,
>>12:38:46
>>12:39:46
>dumb samefagging poster
not true, coincidence
Also your first point in the post contradicts the second one, don't you think?
>>2740963
>Also your first point in the post contradicts the second one, don't you think?
No, because falseflagging first and then samefagging second is an established institution.
>>2740968
well then I have no idea to convince you otherwise, and I would really like you because I get personally offended when someone accuses me of things I didn't do
All I can say is that that post >>2740872 uses absolutely retarded logic and is easy to call out, as you just did
also this kind of bait would work on /pol/ but /his/ is more intelligent and too slow of a board for this sort of thing to make sense logistically.
My point to this thread was pointing out how arbitrary the international law can be and how certain groups get this "privilege" - even if it's insignificant in this case, I mean it's literally a contest of 'who's the bigger victim'