who should I read before hegel

start with the greeks

>>2733376
I have

>>2733376
what comes after?

>reading a flat-headed, insipid, nauseating, illiterate charlatan

tried reading hegel. his shit makes no sense yo

Kant obviously

File: IMG_6328.jpg (194KB, 394x516px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 394x516px

>>2733374
Read Spinoza then Schopenhauer and skip to Nietszche. Hegel is a shitty obscurantist who thought bondage was sexy and the only obscurantist allowed to obscure is Heidegger and maybe Lacan. That being said, Deleuze blew Lacan the Fucc out

>>2733379
read the romans

>>2733414
>>2733414

File: IMG_0372.jpg (499KB, 2000x1859px) Image search: [Google]

499KB, 2000x1859px

>>2733395
Too hard for u m8 ?

>>2733442
>Philosophy brainlets thinking that their non-fictional (?) romance novelists are "complex"
Wew.

>>2733442
>defending heidegger and lacan

Hume, Kant, and read Schopenhauer at the same time.

Also Hegel sucks donkey balls.

>>2733452
and then read the early moderns

>>2733791
but not before you read the scholastics.

Hume, then Kant responds to Hume. The Fichte and Schelling respond to Kant. Then Hegel synthesizes Fichte and Schelling to respond to Kant

File: 1481053974113.png (550KB, 1000x700px)

550KB, 1000x700px

>reading kant for Hegel

I don't understand this meme. Kant has a different style of writing from Hegel, so I imagine you'd never tell that they speak the same language. Not to mention Kant is boring.

I personally starting with Concept of Irony by Kirkegaard unintentionally, which introduced me to hegelian concepts and how they felt. Then I started with Philosophy of History.

File: 1485411094114.jpg (223KB, 640x461px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 640x461px

Red the Science of Logic

>>2733442
>who thought bondage was sexy
Wtf, I love Hegel now

i think im too stupid for high level philosophy