Academic Works on Early Christianity

File: kknknnmmm.jpg (2MB, 1008x1512px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1008x1512px

>>2732255
>Is Bart Ehrman considered a reputable source?

Yes he would be considered reputable. Many Christians have agreed with his material yet at the same time disagreed with certain aspects of his books. Though his work is vanilla of the secular NT crowd. Anyway here's my recommendation of early church material about Jesus' deity.

>>2732255
pastebins on
imperial cult and early christianity
https://pastebin.com/86yGcfe2
early christianity
https://pastebin.com/Pec8gFeX

>>2732403
also this article on the Galilee has works on historical jesus
https://pastebin.com/iaY30gwK

>>2732255
>Is Bart Ehrman considered a reputable source?
Yes. He's one of the most reputable sources. He's one of the top scholars in the field, and it's basically impossible to take a scholarly class on New Testament or the Early Church without having to use at least one of textbooks. In general, he's probably the best resource for learning about this period because hes a highly regarded scholar and his works are more accessible than most other people at his level. Some people get butthurt that he writes books for popular audiences, too; if that bothers you, get one of his textbooks, translation collections, or monographs.

>>2732255
Lewis Ayres, Nicaea and its Legacy

you're welcome

>>2732377
>>2732403
>>2732404
>>2732424
>>2732678
Thanks.

Just read Tacitus and Celsus instead.

>>2735007
Really?