How accurate is this chart?
>>2720344
It's based off a far more popular image that itself is a misrepresentation of evolution, so not very.
The neanderthal with arthritis was a neanderthal with arthritis, not a homo sapien with arthritis.
>>2720344
Wtf i love creationism now
>>2720766
About as believable as this.
>>2720766
the chalk part always gets me
>>2720344
If it's supposed to show linear continuity, it's complete bullshit. Also the commentary reeks of creationist bias
>>2720344
Piltdown man alone is enough to make the whole chart irrelevant.