Suffering vs non-existense

Non-existence is the true red pill.

>>2718074
What's worse for whom? And what do you mean by worse? Morally?

>>2718277
would you choose for yourself eternal life coupled with eternal suffering over non-existence?

>>2718074
The ability to question whether or not one exists is pretty compelling, too

>>2718074
it depends
is cutting yourself while shaving worse or better than not-existing?
is having cold?
or pneumonia?
or broken leg?
suffering is fine as long as it is bearable and life have something more for you to offer
surely, if suffering is all in life of X, with no respite or hope, than it is better to X to not exist

>>2718074
Non-existance. But everyone instinctively resists becoming non-existant. The result of evolution. But on a individual level continuing to suffer doesn't make sense.

It is not possible to not exist.

The particles that make up your brain will always exist. When you die your brain stops functioning, it no longer recalls memories and stores and processes information, you are still there, but you experience nothing but white noise and your intelligence drops to practically zero and that is it, for eternity.

>>2719585
It's less than white noise and it drops to zero.

I'd probably rather be a slave or something than not exist.

But I'd rather not exist than be confined to a torture chamber or eternal damnation.

>>2718074
when is this from? reverse google tells me wommen's day is a communist ploy

>>2719585
>The particles that make up your brain will always exist

yeah, the nutrients will be repurposed into the bacteria and decomposing worms that eat out your skull as you decay. enjoy becoming part of the earth again, you probably get off to the thought fucking hippy

>>2719752
WWII propaganda poster

>>2718074
thats what I heard in westworld