If everyone's worldview changes with time and life experience what's the point of holding any deep convictions in the fist place?
It all seems like a load of bunk to me.
Why? To go along for the ride. Who knows where you'll end up at the end?
>>2712383
If your convictions are deep enough, no amount of evidence can change your mind.
>>2712383
This question confuses me.
You literally just answered it in your own post.
Some people like the constancy because essential change is scary.
Also, how much do people's convictions change over time?
And what level of conviction are we talking about?
There are levels.
>>2712383
>what's the point of holding any deep convictions
emotional bullshit
despite the obvious knowledge that reason is more beneficial than emotional discharge, almost anyone would take the latter any day.
You literally have to hold convictions.
>>2712383
Heuristics which allow you to make decisions based on principles which you believe will benefit you in the long run until you find that it no longer will or never has, and you must move on to something else. Humans like to believe they are self consistent. That is why the accusation of hypocrisy is deeply offensive.
your worldview shouldnt change with "life experience"
you dont need to suck dick to know you dont sucking dick
you need to read, absorb knowledge and never be too sure about what you believe in
criticize yourself
>i grew out of it
is like saying i was a retard but not anymore, believe me i know better now teeheee