Sup /his/, gonna post some architecture here. Also am looking for yryl tier images of famous buildings/statues being torn down/replaced by brutalist garbage.
>>2712213
>>2712218
>>2712222
>>2712249
Looks like pic related, the Catholic cathedral in Liverpool, England.
What is it with Catholics and building fucking ugly churches for their magic sky jew to live in?
>>2712269
>>2712271
>>2712273
What does /his/ have to say about veneer construction? I don't mind it as long as it makes sense architecture-wise and the materials are aren't fake.
>>2712307
here in queensland, australia it's the wrong way to build
t. studying building design
>>2712094
>Also am looking for yryl tier images of famous buildings/statues being torn down/replaced by brutalist garbage.
Who fucking cares.
>A civillized architecture thread on /his/
>Oh no here comes the brutalists
>>2712688
>t. Gommie
>>2712210
Hah! I grew up there. Well, across that wide street to the right.
>>2712094
the confederation building, one of the few non-religious buildings here with some sense of aesthetic put into it
>>2712307
Any heat insulation must be on the 'cooler' side of the wall - i.e. reverse from what that picture shows. Otherwise moisture gets trapped in the bricks and the whole construction deteriorates badly. On that picture that insulation should be between a brick wall (instead of drywall) and OSB sheathing.
>>2712327
Why do they teach you it's wrong? Im curious.
>>2714536
I'm not him, but I'm pretty sure they teach that because it's dishonest. Veneers give the illusion that more work was put into a building than what was actually the case.
this one is a sketch for a james bond movie, the best way to understand the idea of a design is allways looking for the drawings
/his/fag who used to study architecture at university
>>2713203
perhaps you could contribute instead of gomplain )))))))))))))
>>2715706
>I left a bunch of brutalist buildings because they were kinda neat
>I read a wikipedia article about architecture for 5 minutes
>>2718248
r u me )))))))
>>2718143
A distinct lack of architecture is better than the very opposite of the purpose of architecture.