Was the aristocratic class superior to the modern wealthy or

>Smelly inbred politically powerful NEETS

Vs

>Intelligent, hardworking, genetically superior capitalists

Aristocracy are the results of hundreds of generations of high breeding dating back to the time of protocivilizations.

Rich capitalists are often low born low brow scum who have more dollars than sense.

It's all in the face of a person. You can tell right away.

File: Unsorted 1605.jpg (2MB, 4086x5899px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4086x5899px

but does breeding really create better people in the long run, what about all the insane and deformed monarchs? doesn't the idea of an aristocracy create inbreeding

i don't really mind if inbreeding creates some bad examples though, just if the aristocracy really had ascended people

There are some critiques of class analysis in the french revoloution that say the french aristocrats were even keeping up with the capitalists in economic innovation

Also, does art created for the masses, is it inferior to art that was produced for aristocrats?

>>2687185
>>2687169
Pleb tier response. Nobility is found in all caste, the only thing you need to do is be yourself.

>>2687169
You don't get wealthy in capitalism with a low IQ

Aristocracies are literally made of drooling abominations

>>2687185
>insane and deformed monarchs
Not as widespread as people seem to claim.

>doesn't the idea of an aristocracy create inbreeding
Not really.

>>2687199
>You don't get wealthy in capitalism with a low IQ
You most definitely can.

Aristocrats became obsolete once European monarchs had control over standing armies, trade networks and bureaucracy. Their whole reason for being was to provide fighting men and some semblance of territorial control; often, they were more trouble than they were worth, and increasingly devolved into feckless hedonists as they became even more useless. Any other contributions they could have made to society would be obviated by the development of education systems.

File: 1eb556a87028e72fe2291f65d8a795da.jpg (32KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 640x640px

>>2687169
>It's all in the face of a person. You can tell right away.

File: Charles II.jpg (54KB, 602x724px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 602x724px

>>2687169
>Aristocracy are the results of hundreds of generations of high breeding dating back to the time of protocivilizations.
>It's all in the face of a person. You can tell right away.
Couldn't agree more.

>>2687263
All he proved is that aristocracy is literally retard proof. The enlightenment was a mistake

thank you for posting an anime image

File: gary dahl.jpg (196KB, 1050x844px) Image search: [Google]

196KB, 1050x844px

>>2687199
Give the creator of the pet rock a country lets see how smart he is

>>2687045
The bourgeoisie divide labor. The same person who builds a company isn't qualified to lead the army and vice versa. While some business leaders cross into government most politicians spend decades in the government before they get near the top.

putting some guy in charge and trusting that education and grooming will make him a good leader is no better than a crap shoot

>>2687152
fpbp

>>2687152
pretty much this

aristocrats have all the corruption and disdain for normal people as the higher classes of today but none of the meritocracy or innovation

>>2687045
No because at least there is some mobility in today's society.

>>2687185
What a cute JC.
>>2687515
I can gaurantee that guy would be a better leader than some dummy like Chucky or Nick.

File: Unsorted 1746.png (2MB, 2893x4092px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2893x4092px

>>2688733
the question isn't is it more just, the question is if they were 'better' people in your opinion; maybe 'greater' is a better term

For all those that think aristocracy breeding had no effect on the populations of nations I ask you to look closely at nations that had/have strong caste systems.

Britain and India in particular are good examples. Both have long histories of caste systems and to this day the results are evident.