Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: 26e3a111d7553fa26e2944d6de68a4f3.png (454KB, 1800x872px) Image search:
[Google]
454KB, 1800x872px
I don't know if this is the right board but I think so since I'm asking about things from historical perspective.
I wonder how will (current) internet be perceived by art historians in upcomingdecades and centuries? Will they just brush them off aside or will they be looked at as a serious art movement?
After all some of them not that different from things like dadaism and are infinitely creative due to sheer amount of them
Worst timeline: the only ones remembered are those horrible impact image macrosthat your aunt shares on facebook
I don't know if this is the right board but I think so since I'm asking about things from historical perspective.
pic barely related, grabbed random one from google
>>
shameless bump
>>
File: Figure-1-Map-of-Sikkim-showing-drainage-and-research-sites-1-Shipgyer-2-Chujachen.png (609KB, 850x1300px) Image search:
[Google]
609KB, 850x1300px
>>
I think that instead of remembering the internet they will remember phases of mass-communication be put into effect. In other words, the internet of the 80's is nothing like the internet of the 2010's, so they'll be separated and defined by how much access people have to it and how much access it has to everything else. Overall it'll be remembered as the period where we "linked up", so to speak, and the age of the isolated person ended.
>>
>not putting the best known Dreamworks kino on the chart
>>
>>2677417
what would be the breaking point? mid 00s?
Thread posts: 6
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2