Libya

>>2675481
"My people love me." - Ghaddafi

All the proof you need, OP.

>>2675481
If they all 100% liked him, he would've won despite all the help from the West.

Except it wasn't the case.

Consider the fact that when the Civil War statrted, he broke open the armories and distributed arms to civilians, thinking that "his bibol loev him" and would defend him. Turns out many of them used it to fuck him up and Benghazi became a rallying point for rebs.

>>2675490
Lol thats bulshit. The west can overcome all of these nations.

>>2675504
Sure is taking its fucking time in Syria. What is now, 7 years? Gaddaffi was brought down in one. Differences in power bases, nigger.

Local divisions bring down cunts like these more than just Western intervention. Airstrikes never brought down governments. Otherwise South Vietnam would still be here.

>>2675524
Thats not proving anything its all theories.

Statistically the most developed, highest hdi and per captia wealth, huge external reserves.

File: LIBIA_colonel_muammar_al_gaddafi.jpg (48KB, 376x273px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 376x273px

>>2675524
To be fair. Assad did have help of his own.
Gaddafi meanwhile was a nutcase who burned every diplomatic bridge he had. When the Civil War began, the only one who had his ass were fucking Subsaharan Africans, and what could they do?

>>2675535
Says someone who argued
>The west can overcome all of these nations.

>>2675536
Any proof of this? Some say that it was highly concentrated wealth at the top is that true?

>>2675524
Assad would be long gone without Iran and Russia

>>2675545
>>2675524
These arent the answers im looking for. Its still a theory.

>>2675563
Here's a fact: Gaddaffi was still brought down by Libyans, not by somebody else. So clearly he wasn't that well liked.

>>2675573
So? It could have been a small group of fake Libyans paid by the U.S. This doesnt change anything.

>>2675573
>not by somebody else
Actually sub-Saharan islamist forces played a huge role in overthrowing him.

>>2675481
The guy was detested. He used Libya as his own personal piggy bank.

>>2675481
Lybian here.

People hated the guy. Only edgy white boys living in comfy Western cities will tell you otherwise.

>>2675586
>These arent the answers im looking for. Its still a theory.
Love eating your own words, don't you?

>>2675481
>>2675699
Lybian here.

People loved him. Only edgy brown lefties boys living ocean away from here will tell you otherwise.

>>2675780
back to /pol/, white boy

>>2675829
>b-b-but muh /pol/

The only people who love him are contrarian /pol/ dickheads who unironically post the same shitty infographic that makes no sense.

>>2675869
>most of lybian people are /pol/ now.

>>2675481
From what I recall, he was really popular when he was young, and as soon as he consolidated power, people naturally started disliking him. A dictator nonetheless, I believe he had a ridiculous mansion

>>2675932
And a balling golden gun

File: 1492351768551.jpg (114KB, 434x428px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 434x428px

Why do western liberal socialists hate middle eastern socialist leaders so much?

Assad, Hussein, Ghaddafi were all successful Socialist leaders dicked over by the West. It perplexes me that when you mention them, most western liberal leftists go frothing in the mouth from hatred and their views become indistinguishable from typical right-wing neocon warmongers.

Is being a good goy so important to them that they completely forget your their views?

>>2675934
Post pic

File: 1480716296378.png (431KB, 551x334px) Image search: [Google]

431KB, 551x334px

>>2675948
>forget your their views?

*forget their views

was initially supposed to be a reply

>>2675948
They were not successful. They just brutalized their people into catatonia and hopelessness so that it seemed from the outside that these places were "well run"

>>2676000
The hopelessness was caused largely by Western sanctions and subversion campaigns. Can't have middle easterners controlling their own countries resources.

File: Screen Shot 2011-10-20 at 5.20.31 PM_thumb.png (159KB, 640x421px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 640x421px

>>2675954
Here you go, anon

>>2676013
>>2676000
Oh boy more theories. Eveybody just seems to believe whatever they like to believe. ANyways I found what I was looking for.

https://globalciviliansforpeace.wordpress.com/2011/11/09/the-standard-of-living-in-libya/

This article sources the world health organization so I can tell its not lying.

They didn't hate him enough to ruin their country in the process of removing him.

>>2676179
>>2676000
>>2676013
>>2675869
>>2675780
>>2675699
I would be an imbicile if I just took this and believed it as fact. Everybody just hears one thing from a false source and believes it. Such bullshit does anybody have any way to prove their claims?

How do you know?

>>2676013
>The hopelessness was caused largely by Western sanctions and subversion campaigns
Lemme guess, Saddam just *had* to gas those pesky Kurds, didn't he?

>>2676172
>muh living standards

Why does that matter at all when Gaddafi walks into your teenage sisters classroom, points a finger at her, and you never hear from her again?

>>2676172
Well done. Why make the thread if what you wanted was a google search?

>>2676184
>How do you know?
the biggest lies in recent history (muh wmds) were perpetrated by western organizations so western source = probably bullshit

>>2676195
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanctions_against_Iraq

500000 Iraqi children are estimated to have died due to sanctions. Halabja was nothing in comparison.

>>2675536
>>2675561

Libya under Qadaffi was a black box, no-one outside the country had any idea what it was like inside. All we have is Qadaffis own self-serving lies about how developed and prosperous his country was, lies that useful idiots continue to trot out as "proof" that he dindu nuffin, and wasn't the child murdering serial rapist and despot he actually was.

>>2675653

No, moron, the muslim niggers he brought into the country were the ones who supported him, since he had given them special privileges and used them to control his own people with whatever violence and brutality they felt like using.

It was ordinary Libyans who rose up and killed this rat faggot, shooting him while he cowered in a drain like the vermin he was.

>>2675874

Libyans didn't love him you edgy /pol/turd retard.

>>2675948
>Hussein

Why do ""people"" like you love to suck the cocks of psychopathic mass murderers? Why do you feel such contempt for brown people that you think they're better off under the heel of psychopaths like Hussein and Qadaffi? For all that you ""people"" love to accuse others of MUH RACISM, it's extremely obvious from your views that YOU are the racist.

>>2675948
Because Arab """socialism""" is a meme that goes against the biggest tenants of communism.

>>2676172
>blog
>by a bunch of Qadaffi supporters

Yeah, nice objective source you have there, moron.

If a Republican prez bombed Gaddafi the tables would be turned and reddit would be defending him and 4chan would be demonizing him I guarantee you this 1000%

>>2676229
>sactions

Protip moron: The sanctions didn't apply to food and medicine, the reason those children died is because Saddam withheld food and medicine from them and blamed it on the West.

File: 1491580261301.jpg (147KB, 720x709px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 720x709px

>>2676258
>Why do ""people"" like you love to suck the cocks of psychopathic mass murderers?

And the western leaders you fellate are what exactly?

I never called anyone here a racist. I'm calling you sheep. You called me a racist for having the audacity to suggest that non-western nations should be allowed to sort themselves out without the west bombing them under false pretext.

>>2676278
Read the fucking article faggot.
>Persons wishing to deliver items to Iraq, whether in trade or for charitable donation, were required to apply for export licenses to the authorities of one or more UN member state, who then sent the application to the Sanctions Committee. The Committee made its decision in secret; any Committee member could veto a permission without giving any reason.

You think a system like this wouldn't effect healthcare and other basic needs?

>>2676300

Yeah, George W is comparable to Saddam Hussein. That's a totally reasonable comparison and not at all the pathetic grasping of a moral coward and murder apologist piece of shit.

>sanctions
You have any evidence for food and medicine being turned back? No? Is that because it didn't happen? The reason Iraq suffered was because Saddam was a psychopathic narcissist, not because of the sanctions (which were widely considered totally ineffective anyway).

You are the worst kind of scum. A true piece of shit. Your whore mother must be very proud to now her child is a worthless sack of cum who defends psychopathic massmurderers on basketweaving forums.

File: 1480717987851.jpg (42KB, 1137x640px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 1137x640px

>>2676337
>Yeah, George W is comparable to Saddam Hussein.

Bush is worse by every metric. Shorter reign, more power, more innocents killed.

>You have any evidence for food and medicine being turned back?

Look numbnuts, it worked like this. For example, chlorine can be used to manufacture CW so it was of course part of the ban but it is, also necessary for water purification. Tens of thousands died in Iraq due to drinking contaminated water. Saddam had nothing to do with it.

From the article:
>Denis Halliday was appointed United Nations Humanitarian Coordinator in Baghdad, Iraq as of 1 September 1997, at the Assistant Secretary-General level. In October 1998 he resigned after a 34-year career with the UN in order to have the freedom to criticise the sanctions regime, saying "I don't want to administer a programme that satisfies the definition of genocide"[28]

>You are the worst kind of scum. A true piece of shit. Your whore mother must be very proud to now her child is a worthless sack of cum who defends psychopathic massmurderers on basketweaving forums.

Holy shit you really got triggered by me bursting your western holier-than-thou messianic bubble.

Libya under Qaddafi was pure shit compared to the paradise it is now:

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/04/iom-african-migrants-traded-libya-slave-markets-170411141809641.html

>>2676229
There were WMD's in Iraq.

File: 1492028560909.jpg (88KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 1024x1024px

>>2676477

>>2676409

What a load of shit. You're no better than any of the vermin you defend.

My neighbors are from Libya, they've told me he wasn't really well loved or anything but not particularly hated. He was a madman, but a madman that kept everything running fairly smoothly. I don't think Libya was the greatest place to live, but it was relatively safe and you could make a decent living for your family without too much interference from the higher ups.

>>2676689
none of them were functional, they were old russian weapons and shit and nothing like what our government was actually looking for

>>2675524
Lol Gadhaffi and Assad aren't comparable.

One ruled an isolated stated with a castrated military to avoid risk of a military coup.

The other rules a country with strong allies both globally and locally, as well as a decent military.

>>2675481
I just want everyone ITT to have a good laugh. Can you imagine media actually taking this up with a straight face, with no hint to how it's literally on par with
>ate children for breakfast

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2598157/Gaddafi-kept-dead-enemies-killed-CIA-hit-squad-coolers-viewing-ran-university-rape-dungeon-documentary-reveals.html

>>2676824
>how dare he say murrica isn't world savior
>how dare he say the bigger killer is worse

>>2676893

I never said a thing about America, I just laughed at your pathetic attempt to equate W to Saddam Hussein. You are a pathetic joke of a faggot.

>>2676879
This. Syria and Libya are comparable in that the CIA turned both into a bloodbath rife with Sunni terrorist though.

File: CluNG2MUsAA99U2.jpg (69KB, 598x792px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 598x792px

>>2676898
They don't equate. Bush is worse. Ad hom is not an argument.

>>2676903
Why would I waste my time arguing with a piece of shit like you? You lie and lie like its your religion, and you fantasise about homosex with tyrants and massmurderers. You truly are a pure sack of literal human shit.

>>2676910
>ad hominem
Good argument.

>>2676910
lmao you sure are mad buddy

If you don't have any real arguments to defend your views then fuck off.

>>2676914
>>2676915

Again why would I waste an argument on a sack of shit? You've outed yourself as a fascist and genocide supporter, nothing more I can do will make you look like more of a worthless failure.

>>2676924
>double ad hominem
Are you going for a new record?

>>2676903
Bush was no angel but to say "Bush is worse than Saddam" reeks of either idiocy or edgy teenage angst.

>>2676927

Once again, since you are obviously too moronic to understand, I'm not trying to argue with you, you pathetic sack of shit. I'm just insulting you. That's not an ad hom, it's just an insult. But of course you;re too thick to understand this, so let me reiterate it for you, you THICK bastard.

>>2676929

The guy's obviously a moron with a fetish for moustachioed massmurderers.

>>2676924
>>2676939
>>2676941

>Again why would I waste an argument on a sack of shit?

sounds more like you have no real argument besides butthurt

you are already wasting a lot of time on me posting, seemingly through tears.

>>2676943

I didn't think it was possible you could STILL not understand, after I'd made myself so clear. Good for you for proving that you;re even stupider than I thought you were!

>>2676954
keep posting, i'm having a ball

>>2676959

I'm sure you are you pin-headed little faggot, that's why your replies reek of fail and desperation. You're as obvious as you are stupid.

>>2676929
>Be Bush
>Destroy Iraq by selling lie to American people
>100,000 dead
>Destroy Afghanistan, bringing Heroine production of that country to an all time high
>Allow real perpetrators of 9/11 to go off scott free
>Create medicare D but don't allow US govt to bid on prices, driving up drug prices to unsustainable levels
>Pass "patriot" act which allows unlimited data collection of US citizens and people around the world
>Increase power of Military industrial complex and govt agencies
>Guantanamo bay
>Put cuckservative on the supreme court who's pro homosexual marriage and pro obamacare.
Bush is worse than Saddam Hussein by a large margin if only by virtue of his corruption and ineptitude causing more tyranny in the world by a large margin. Saddam was just another socialist tinpot dictator who actually kept the Middle East stable.

>>2676973
>100000 dead

The consequences of Bush's invasion of Iraq are closer to 1000000 dead civilians.

Saddam doesn't even come close to this amount even if you count the whole Iran-Iraq war and aftermath as his personal responsibility.

>>2676973

Bush killed exactly zero people.Yes he ordered a war, yes people died in it, no he didn't kill them. You now who else launched wars? Your beloved power bottom Saddam. Iran Iraq war? 500,000 dead, at least 100,000 of them civilians. But wait! On top of that, there's the ~500,000 Iraqi civilians he murdered, thru chemical attack and extra-judicial killings. But wait, isn't ~1,000,000 MORE than the 100,000 you ludicrously lay at Bush's door? Why yes, yes it is! I guess even by your own moronic and ridiculous standards, your idol Saddam is about ten times as bad as Bush!

>>2676997
See >>2676995

>>2677001

See what? A load of garbage by a mass murder apologist? Yeah, let's blame Bush for the civil war in Iraq, let's not lay the blame for that on those who, you know, actually waged the civil war, who target civilians by preference. Let's not blame Obama, who sat on his hands for 8 years while the Iraqi civil war raged, no, it's ALL the fault of Bush!

You dumb faggot. You're as disgusting as that other creep.

>>2677015
>the person who orders the war is not responsible for the results of the war
I guess Hitler has no responsibility for the results of WW2.

File: 230304eb8ad059a569df594a76177509b36e940c696476df1a554397fae86e0e_1.jpg (278KB, 800x2264px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 800x2264px

>>2676997
>this whole thread

>>2677015
Ok man. I'm sorry for insulting your beloved Bush and putting the blame squarely on him.

Obama is also a mass murderer.

>>2676995
>>2677001
Every statistic I've seen doesn't exceed even 200,000 at their highest. Unless you are trying to pin every single thing that's happened afterwards directly on him. Otherwise I'd love to see where you're getting these numbers.

>>2677020

Is Hitler responsible for the crimes of the East Germans? Because by your """""reasoning"""" he must be. Mind you, if I were to take you at your word (which I won't, because I know you;re just a lying sack of shit) then Saddam is responsible for everything that happens in Iraq up to the present day.

>>2675780

>leftie

Libya was aligned with the USSR, bankrolled Marxist movements, and today Gaddaffi is mostly defended by tankies.

>>2677030

Oh Obama too? Let me guess, he's worse than the psychopathic mass murderer Saddam as well, right? You fucking clown.

>>2677034
Don't you have anything better to do than shitpost on 4chan to ease your guilty conscious and justify your warcrimes, dubya?

>>2677038
>he's worse than the psychopathic mass murderer Saddam as well

You're learning.

>>2677056

Literally pathetic.

>>2677052
>HURR

So because you love Saddam and tried to equate his crimes with those of W, in your pathetic little brain that means I must BE Bush? Wow, what a clown you are!

YOU brought Bush into this, dumb-dumb. I guess that means YOU must be Bush!

>>2677069
>dubya on sucide watch
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SBf4DCpL1Q4

>>2677083

You are a true moron. A disgusting shit-covered moron, but still, a true moron.

>>2677069
Dude I actually agree with you but please stop your autism is making us all look bad.

File: 1479447680140.jpg (54KB, 622x468px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 622x468px

>>2677085
you don't have to be an autistic fuck to spout western propaganda but it helps

>>2677085
>Dude I actually agree with you
No you don't you dumb coon. Obama is worse than Saddam? Bush is worse than Saddam? On what possible world is this true? You;re an apologist for some of the worst people who ever lived.

>Dude I actually agree with you

No, you aligning yourself with some of the worst human filth ever to live is what makes you look bad, you sorry sack of shit.

File: 1464975149454.jpg (13KB, 144x189px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 144x189px

>>2677095
Holy shit he's lost it.

>>2677095
I'm not the other poster you autistic mongrel, >>2677085 was my first post in the entire thread

>>2677097
>HURR

>>2677104
>DURR

Then maybe don';t reply to a post as tho you were that guy without clarifying you fucking moron.

>>2677110
>What is reading comprehension
I said I agreed with you, why would the other guy say they agree with you when they were arguing with you for the entire thread? Anyone who wasn't an autistic faggot would have been able to figure that out.

But please, continue to throw a hissy fit in the thread, that will surely show everyone else.

>>2677095
>Obama is worse than Saddam? Bush is worse than Saddam? On what possible world is this true?

In a world where rulers are responsible for the consequences of their policies and the greater the power they hold the greater the scrutiny.

>>2677113
>HURR U CANYT READ MINDS U MUZ BE AUTIZM

Go fuck yourself you sad little faggot.

>>2677124

What a truly revolting little creep you are. Saddam isn't to blame for the MILLION deaths he directly caused, because Bush was more powerful? Vile.

>>2677126
You are literally lashing out and insulting everyone that posts in this thread lol.

Why are you so mad? Did Saddam have your family killed? If so I'm sorry but that still doesn't make him worse than Bush.

>>2677131
Bush likely caused more deaths. He had greater knowledge and power than Saddam which makes his terrible decisions more damning.

>>2677124
So are we supposed to be judging the person by the person or the unintended result of their action?

>>2677162
Intentions are irrelevant what matters is preconditions and results.

Is this what shilling looks like I'd the record being corrected?

>>2677174
I doubt he is a shill. Some people are just so indoctrinated by mainstream western thought that they lash out when their worldview is put into question. The focal point of this mindset is the sense of moral superiority. Undermine that and they go rabid.

>>2677160
>Bush likely caused more deaths.

Firstly, Bush didn't cause any deaths: He launched a war to remove a psychopath who had already murdered at least 1 million people. That's milliom with an M. Even if you take the view that he is directly responsible for every death during the war to remove Saddam, that;s at most 100,000. So no, even by your own disgusting and perverse "body count is all that matters" ""standards"", Bush is far less evil than your idol Saddam.

>>2677162

Saddam launched an invasion of another country that cost 500,000 lives. He also directly and personally had at least the same number of his own people murdered, often with chemical attacks that targetted civilians. Bush, meanwhile, lead a coalition to remove Saddam from power. He didn't invade Iraq to annex it, like Saddam did to Iran, he didn't even occupy the country but (foolishly) left that to the natives. To equate Bush with Saddam, or to claim he was WORSE than Saddam, it is necessary to lie. This makes you a liar, as well as a genocide apologist.

>>2677196
>Firstly, Bush didn't cause any deaths
If Bush didn't cause any death then neither did Saddam. I doubt he personally strangled his victims.

>Saddam launched an invasion of another country that cost 500,000 lives

You neglect to mention that he was goaded into launching that invasion by the US and had their full support. Through all of his rule Saddam was a puppet of the great powers. A puppet is less responsible for the consequences of his actions than the puppeteers.

>>2677207
So Saddam was an OK guy after all?

>>2677196
If anyone here is a genocide apologist it's you.

http://genocidewatch.net/2016/07/12/iraq-invasion-sounded-death-knell-for-iraqi-christians/

1,4 million Christians were in Iraq in 2003. Only 250000 remain. The rest were either killed or driven away by the turmoil caused by Bush and Obama.

>>2677207
Can you give any sources for these claims? Cite a book or anything?

Also

>If Bush didn't cause any death then neither did Saddam

There's a massive difference between an aggressor and a liberator regardless of how imperfect they each might have been. That's like saying FDR is equally as responsible for the German civilians and POWs killed by American troops during WW2 as Hitler was for the Slavs, Gypsies and Jews killed. It's such an insanely black and white absolutist morality.

>>2677262
>Can you give any sources for these claims? Cite a book or anything?

I can. Feel free to educate yourself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_support_for_Iraq_during_the_Iran%E2%80%93Iraq_war

>an aggressor and a liberator

Literally the same thing but with spin. Hitler styled himself as the liberator of Slavs that was saving them from the oppressive Soviet regime. Did stop him from genociding them.

>It's such an insanely black and white absolutist morality.

Oh the irony.

>>2677276
*Didn't stop him

>>2677253
The vast majority of them weren't killed I'm sure you know, rather they just left. It's not as if Iraq was exactly welcoming to them before Bush or anything.

>>2677282
One of Saddam's closest advisors was a Christian. His iron rule kept the religious violence in check and allowed Christians to exist. Removing Saddam resulted in the ethnic cleansing of Christians from Iraq.

>>2677276
>Literally the same thing but with spin.

No, it's not "literally the same thing" unless you are either intentionally obtuse or are purposefully spinning a narrative. Under your logic FDR, Churchill, Stalin, and Hitler are all "literally the same thing". There is no logic in that argument. You seem to lack nuance.

>Oh the irony.

Yes please do explain. I never claimed Bush was a good president, in fact I think he was a terrible one. Yet I'm not the one calling him "worse than Saddam".

>I can. Feel free to educate yourself

I wasn't aware W. was in office during that conflict, or have we changed topics to two separate presidents now?

>>2677317
>FDR, Churchill, Stalin

Invited to liberate invaded countries by their respective governments in exile ie. actual liberator.

>Hitler, Bush

Nobody invited them to liberate anyone so they are aggressors that spun their aggression as liberation.

>Yes please do explain.
You accuse me of primitive black and white morality while it is you who deal in absolutes. "Saddam is a narcissistic psychopath who gassed millions while Bush is a liberator that did nothing wrong." I claim that they are both killers but that Bush and Obama are much worse.

>I wasn't aware W. was in office during that conflict

He wasn't but American support for that war is still pretty damning to your country as a whole don't you think? Also, it dilutes Saddam's responsibility since he was goaded by both the great powers.

>>2677253
You tell this to a neocon/neolib he sees it as a plus. They hate Christians and want to see them wiped out in the Middle East.

His people got their bread and circus but rioted anyway because gibs wasn't good enough.
>peaceful protesters target armories

>>2677336
>Invited to liberate invaded countries by their respective governments in exile

So when the US invaded to liberate Kuwait and Saudi Arabia they weren't actual liberators? What about when Hitler liberated Danzig? The majority of it's people wanted to be part of Germany after all.

>Nobody invited them to liberate anyone

Hitler certainly was. The first Bush was as well. The 2nd Bush was more of a gray area I'll give you that, but at least he responded to a perceived threat.


Also, I never said America was blameless or that Saddam was never pushed to do certain things. That doesn't change my overall stance, however.

>>2677370
>So when the US invaded to liberate Kuwait and Saudi Arabia they weren't actual liberators?

You're confused. That was Bush Senior not Junior.

>What about when Hitler liberated Danzig?

What are you talking about. Danzig was a Free City before 1939 and was annexed by Hitler. Danzig hardly needed liberation from the 80 polish troops that served in the post office...

>That doesn't change my overall stance, however.

My impression is that if you were to study some more history your stance would eventually change. I sense a lot of cognitive dissonance.

After some persuasion I managed to start a discussion so I'm glad. I'm going to bed now so no replies for some while.

>>2676237
If it was a black box then why can you be so certain that he was a evil boogeyman?
Sounds like you're a faggot

>>2677196
W didn't launch a war to remove a dictator. He fought to remove WMD's. This is no longer the realm of /his/. Go back to /pol/

>>2677396
>You're confused. That was Bush Senior not Junior.

I was under the impression we seemed to be talking about them both since you brought him up in the first place.

>What are you talking about. Danzig was a Free City before 1939 and was annexed by Hitler. Danzig hardly needed liberation from the 80 polish troops that served in the post office...

Danzig was populated mainly by ethnic Germans and was controlled by the Nazi party by the time WW2 kicked off.

> I sense a lot of cognitive dissonance.

And what would that cognitive dissonance be, exactly? There's nothing you've mentioned that has contradicted anything I've said that I haven't given a response to. Saying you sense cognitive dissonance and then not simply pointing it out reeks of dis-ingenuousness. Making a statement like that and then "going to bed" is an incredibly cheap cop out to the argument as I know you are well aware.

File: Moro Insurgency.jpg (274KB, 360x2100px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 360x2100px

>>2675481
>He was a blameless lamb, you guuuuys!
>Totally did not hide terrorists like members of the IRA.

>He was better than the Islamists you guuuuys
>Totally did not fund Islamic terror groups abroad like the MNLF in the Philippines.

I'm glad he died the way he did.

Damn I was pretty excited to see that my thread had reached 122 posts. Am now dissapointed to see that its just faggot shills arguing with each other. I came to his because I thought shills wouldnt be here. They took pol and x now I guess every board is dead.

Also shut the fuck up about shitty stupid arguments. "Doyyy bush is da worst Bashar is da worst" all of you are equally garbage. I dont give a fuck if they ordered people to kill each other. How can you even judge how 'bad' a person is. Bad and worst doesnt even exist we just make it up. Which tool do you use to measure somebodies goodness?

Ghaddafi Libya:
There is no electricity bill in Libya; electricity is free for all its citizens.
There is no interest on loans, banks in Libya are state-owned and loans given to all its citizens at zero percent interest by law.
Having a home considered a human right in Libya.
All newlyweds in Libya receive $60,000 dinar (U.S.$50,000) by the government to buy their first apartment so to help start up the family.
Education and medical treatments are free in Libya. Before Gaddafi only 25 percent of Libyans were literate. Today, the figure is 83 percent.
Should Libyans want to take up farming career, they would receive farming land, a farming house, equipments, seeds and livestock to kickstart their farms are all for free.
If Libyans cannot find the education or medical facilities they need, the government funds them to go abroad, for it is not only paid for, but they get a U.S.$2,300/month for accommodation and car allowance.
If a Libyan buys a car, the government subsidizes 50 percent of the price.
The price of petrol in Libya is $0.14 per liter.
Libya has no external debt and its reserves amounting to $150 billion are now frozen globally.
If a Libyan is unable to get employment after graduation the state would pay the average salary of the profession, as if he or she is employed, until employment is found.
A portion of every Libyan oil sale is credited directly to the bank accounts of all Libyan citizens.
A mother who gives birth to a child receive U.S.$5,000.
40 loaves of bread in Libya costs $0.15.
25 percent of Libyans have a university degree.
Gaddafi carried out the world’s largest irrigation project, known as the Great Manmade River project, to make water readily available throughout the desert country.
Gaddafi just wanted to have a gold backed currency and a united Africa

He was going to launch a satellite for easier communication and internet access for all of Africa.

>>2678829
>b-b-b-ut what about muh gender rights
>muh gay rights
>muh freeedom of spech
>wimen rights too hurr

File: 1469027721121.gif (2MB, 300x226px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x226px

>>2678296
>>2678308

OP is a faggot as usual.

>>2676910
>Why would I waste my time arguing with a piece of shit like you?

Confirmed for BTFO

>>2677502
>And what would that cognitive dissonance be, exactly?

Notice that you went from defending Bush's unjustified aggression against Iraq to defending Hitler's unjustified aggression against Poland. Unless you are some closet naziboo larper that seems like cognitive dissonance.

>>2675562
Assad would have won long ago without USA, Saudis and Katar and their foreign mercenaries. Your point?

>>2679020
women were more emancipated under his islamic gommunism than more sharia-defined states.

File: 1490890495401.png (91KB, 291x173px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 291x173px

>>2675481
He could had not been overthrown by """"rebels"""" without the American bombing campaign.

That is proof enough.

File: 1491557648674.png (481KB, 1395x1135px) Image search: [Google]

481KB, 1395x1135px

>>2677095

>>2675699
>Lybian

I believe you

>>2676229

>weatern institution = western source = bullshit

that was one fucking commission
with multiple other "western institutions" crying bullshit over it
being an institution from the west doesn't make you any more predisposed towards forgery than your counterparts in the east, or the intermediate zone