>>2671126
Did he know there was a surgical operation to fix that lazy eye?
Also, grew up in a radicalized religious household so probably one of the most dangerous people to put in charge of men.
>Builds massive military industrial complex
>Complains about it
I wish only that we could have that decade's qualities back, minus the soviets and communists
>>2671143
get thee to europe you damnable thorn
>>2671148
The reds were what made that time period so great. America needs a common enemy to unite against, otherwise they turn to each other.
>>2671158
that's a lie
>>2671166
Nice argument, friendo
>>2671169
fact is fact
>>2671126
I mean, it's not like there was ever any doubt.
1. Roosevelt (Imperialist).
2. Roosevelt (Commie).
3. McKinley
4. Harding
5. Eisenhoward
6. Wilson
7. Johnson
8. Clinton
9. "Cool"ige
10. Kennedy
11. Reagan
12. Truman
13. Bush Sr.
14. Hoover (did nothing wrong)
15. Ford
16. Nixon
17. C*rter
18. Taft
>>2671194
you have criminally undersold Nixon
>>2671194
*blocks your path*
>>2671249
*plays pokeflute*
>>2671254
*It has no effect.*
>>2671249
OP said 20th century.
Only one fatty per century allowed.
>>2671126
That's not Coolidge.
Although he was the best of the Cold War-era.
>>2671126
We have to carry his torch. We must end the Federal Reserve, and CIA.
>>2671272
there's a lot wrong with your post, for a start, you don't understand the nature of the cold war if you think it begins in the 20s
Objective top 5
1: FDR
2: Woodrow Wilson
3: Truman
4: Eisenhower
5: Ronald Regan
>>2671299
I meant Eisenhower you cave-dwelling ogre.
>>2671260
I was more referring to the fact that Cleveland was the biggest force behind American anti-imperialism
>>2671308
1: FDR
5: Ronald Regan
Do you understand politics?
>>2671325
I don't care about politics, but I do care about its consequences.
>>2671316
Out of all 19th century presidents yes.
But then there's this guy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Brackett_Reed
I recommend the book "War Lovers." It's about Roosevelt, Hearst and Lodge, their desire to go to war and Reed's opposition to that.
But Cleveland was awesome in his own right. Harding and Coolidge were his spiritual successors from a different party.
>>2671325
Well both led disastrous economic policies so they have that in common.
And Wilson but unlike all others this guy didn't do anything right.
>>2671349
Space race is a fascinating story but not that relevant to the world of politics today. His presidency lacked major crises (even the shot down plane was handled professionaly). If I remember he wanted the Soviets to fire their Sputnik first because of possible legal issues or some shit.
>>2671349
>No, he's right. The first red scare was in the 20s.
that happened, but it's not the cold war
>>2671366
Well the comment wasn't about the 20s so everything is good.
>>2671365
With global warming, overpopulation, etc. I would say the need for space tech is more dire than ever.
However, I agree with you that there was no major scandal and that otherwise he was a good president. The highways system in particular was a good idea.
Can you elaborate on the legal issues surrounding Sputnik?
>>2671158
Yea and then use the reds to savagely red-bait the leftists in the country
>but muh leftists aren't people
Disgusting us vs them mentality
>>2671475
in a lot of ways leftists that run amok ruin nice things
>>2671464
I guess it's related to his plan that was rejected by the Soviets.
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/eisenhower-presents-his-open-skies-plan
>>2671481
Are you trying to tell me that breaking national unity by red baiting them is justified coz they hurt your personal and subjective feelings?
>>2671500
http://www.newsweek.com/real-sputnik-story-103299
Better article. But I'm still not sure if it's 100% real. I think American technology just wasn't there yet.
>>2671515
projecting?
>>2671524
No. I just find it absurd that one can pretend national unity after the massive red baiting of the leftists in 20 century and someone dares to justify it by saying that they run amok and ruin nice things.
>>2671126
Objective Top 5:
5. F.D.R.
4. Nixon
3. Wilson
2. Reagan
1. Eisenhower
>>2671333
Oh, I've already read it.
>>2671568
Terrible list.
Typical neo-con bullshit.
>>2671194
>Nixon that low
That man would have saved this country, save for a Senate full of pissy Democrats
>>2671634
Typical libcuck, all salt, no source.
>>2671987
Typical liberal loves piece of shit presidents like FDR and WIlson.
>>2671568
>Reagan
>Wilson
I dont think so bub
>>2671568
ACKTUALLY it goes
FDR
Truman
Eisenhower
Wilson
Carter
>>2672047
>pic related
>>2672036
>you fucking neocon
>actually you're a liberal
Make up your mind senpai
>>2672076
>Tr*man
>C*rter
I thought my bait was good
>>2671126
>Churchill's bitch
>best 20th century president
Get the fuck out.
>>2672081
Who are you talking to?
21st Century Best:
1. 45th ZOG Tyrant Donald "Vladimir" Drumpf
2. 44th ZOG Tyrant Barack HUSSEIN O'Bummer
3. 43th ZOG Tyrant Dumbass Dubyah
>>2671126
Worst:
Abraham Lincoln
Woodrow Wilson
Franklin Roosevelt
Harry Truman
Lyndon Johnson
Bill Clinton
Barack Obama
>>2672104
Who are YOU talking to?
>>2672105
I think it's more or less correct but it doesn't mean much honestly.
I'll weigh in.
Johnson's dick
Johnson
Eisenhower
Nixon
FDR
Teddy
Wilson
Taft
Carter/Ford
Truman
Hoover
Kennedy
Clinton
Bush
Coolidge
Reagan
Harding
Top 3 could be juggled around, depending on your politics. If you like Ike, you should definitely also like Johnson.