mostly
is this racist whitewashing or true?
Its white washing. Everyone knows that they were black.
What the fuck are you talking about
Go to Greece, look at people
They were fucking Nubian you revisionist
>>2671005
they were lol
These retarded threads need to be deleted more often.
>>2671048
Yeah, they're white and so are Turks tb h.
>>2671048
The Byzantine Greeks were mostly hellenized Anatolians. They looked like this
>...a monstrosity of a man, a pygmy, fat-headed and like a mole as to the smallness of his eyes; disgusting with his short, broad, thick, and half hoary beard; disgraced by a neck an inch long; very bristly through the length and thickness of his hair; in color an Ethiopian
>>2671069
>so are Turks tb h
lol no. Greeks are though, most of them don't look like how westerners imagine, most look no less white then western/central/eastern europeans
>>2671119
What is this and where is it from?
WE WUZ BLUES N GREENS N SHIT
>>2671119
>>2671571
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikephoros_II_Phokas
In Bishop Liutprand's description of Nikephoros, a clearly biased source, he is described as:
...a monstrosity of a man, a pygmy, fat-headed and like a mole as to the smallness of his eyes; disgusting with his short, broad, thick, and half hoary beard; disgraced by a neck an inch long; very bristly through the length and thickness of his hair; in color an Ethiopian; one whom it would not be pleasant to meet in the middle of the night; with extensive belly, lean of loin, very long of hip considering his short stature, small of shank, proportionate as to his heels and feet; clad in a garment costly but too old, and foul-smelling and faded through age; shod with Sicyonian shoes; bold of tongue, a fox by nature, in perjury, and lying a Ulysses.[9]
Whereas Bishop Liutprand describes the emperor's hair as being bristly, Leo The Deacon says it was black with "tight curls" and "unusually long".