Why do south slavs want to be afghans so much?

File: hqdefault.jpg (19KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 480x360px

As a bulgarian I didnt realize that serbian wewuzists have the same origin story.

File: 2ivfytd.jpg (447KB, 1310x950px) Image search: [Google]

447KB, 1310x950px

>>2666621
Same for croatians. Weren't they supposed to be lost germanic aryan goths?

>>2666614
bump

People from the Balkans know that they're not really Slavs but slavicised cromagnoids and vlachs and balkanoids so they make up wewuz pashtuns N SHIIIET fairytales.

File: pepe liberator.jpg (53KB, 453x604px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 453x604px

>>2667211
>Germany is more Slavic than the Balkans

>>2667211
Please don't acknowledge it, don't make them want to we wuz.

>>2667236
Ottomemes

File: BEh53ob.jpg (388KB, 1621x1080px) Image search: [Google]

388KB, 1621x1080px

If you look at this man and tell me he doesn't look like he's 100% from Zenica I will call you a liar.

>>2666614
Bulgars were a Turkic people who created the first Bulgarian state which included a lot of Slavs and was eventually Slavenised. It has nothing to do with wanting anything, it's how things went.

>>2666627
>Goths
That's Nazi/Ustasha ideology and it's irrelevant. The Iranic theory of the Croat origin is perfectly plausible. It doesn't imply that modern Croats aren't Slavs, but that the name originally comes from an Iranic tribe.

File: f82a84a69e55770fbf0b9ef9e5ad8dab.jpg (54KB, 564x423px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 564x423px

>>2666614
The white looking Pashtuns and Kafiristanis or Kalash in Pakistan actually look Slavic as fuck.

t. Slav

>>2667530

sheeeet

you could put this guy in slavonia and he wouldn't look too out of place

>>2666614

Can't believe you guys don't know what the indo-european migrations were
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European_migrations

>>2667313
Why is it plausible for croatians to have been originally iranic but not Bulgars?

>>2667530
Such a shame that they are being islamized. They have customs that are closest to the original indoeuropean ones.

File: 1470168513553.jpg (181KB, 800x1108px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 800x1108px

>>2666614
There actualy is some truth to it though. A lot of Iranian nomads came into Eastern Europe- Sarmatians, Scythians, and the supposed Afghan ancestors of Croatians of the Sagartian tribe.

>>2668459
Their pretty distinct from Arabs and genetically isolated though and their customs are unchanged for centuries.
If anything, its the Indoeuripeans of Europe that have changes

>>2668472
>There actualy is some truth to it though. A lot of Iranian nomads came into Eastern Europe- Sarmatians, Scythians, and the supposed Afghan ancestors of Croatians of the Sagartian tribe.

The only theoretical connection is the name. But it has been proven that the name Croat is in fact Turkic in origin and much more recent than the Sarmatians.

Also Iranians didn't just become Slavs, they are both branches of the Indo-european people, and remarkebly the Slavic languages have very little Iranian/Sarmatian influence.

>>2668482
>Their pretty distinct from Arabs and genetically isolated though and their customs are unchanged for centuries.
>If anything, its the Indoeuripeans of Europe that have changes

But they mixed lots with Dravidians Mongols and Arabs over the centuries, that can't be denied.

Check this out about the Indo-European culture
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wg79R5jopj8

>>2668697
>>2668485
>Same Serb/Dinaric shitposter from last thread
It has been conclusively proven that Haravat is an Iranian name and that S*rbs are natural cucks who got removed in 1996. Also get a trip for easier filtering.

>>2668883

That's not me, and what do you have against this documentary? It's pretty professional and accurate

>>2666627
MI

>>2667806
Because we know the Bulgarians are Turkic and got Slaved when they settled in Moesia and Thrace.

>>2669933
BISMO

>>2668459
Yeah, like fucking young boys and oppressing women.

>>2668697
And serbs mixed with various Slavs, Germanics and turks over time so what your point?

>>2670495
>muh womynz rights

bulgarians=eastern orthodox serbs
croatians=western catholicserbs
/thread

>>2670495
What's wrong with the latter?

>>2670863
>>2670998
Hey kids, I just mentioned what the Indo-Euros did. Take it up with them or congratulate them if you prefer.

Unathletic manlets like you need to perish anyway.

>>2671078
>manlets
Projecting?

File: I2a1_SerbMigrations.png (468KB, 1344x399px) Image search: [Google]

468KB, 1344x399px

>>2670855
>And serbs mixed with various Slavs, Germanics and turks over time so what your point?

Not really.

Over 60% I2a1

File: R1b.png (75KB, 1028x743px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1028x743px

The Piast dynasty had R1B.

> The Piast dynasty was the first historical ruling dynasty of Poland.
> 10th century

>>2670099
Except we do not know. Bulgarians have nothing in common genetically with turkic people. We have no evidence that they had turkic apart from the title kan, and this is hardly evidence.

>>2671078
Fucking boys is islamic.

>>2672232
evidence is the name Bulgar. you turk.

>>2672333
There is no evidence that it is a turkic name. Its closer to iranic "Balkhara".

>you turk
Meme troll detected

bump.

t. Afghan Hazara

>>2666627
>Weren't they supposed to be lost germanic aryan goths?

Ultimate cringe theory here.

>>2667313
>That's Nazi/Ustasha ideology and it's irrelevant. The Iranic theory of the Croat origin is perfectly plausible. It doesn't imply that modern Croats aren't Slavs, but that the name originally comes from an Iranic tribe.

This. ^

The we wuz goths is just unconscionable nazi gobbledygook for the most part. But anyways as far as I'm aware a gothic tribe did settle there and over time got mixed in a lot with the people who lived there so their genetic imprint is very small.

http://www.iranchamber.com/history/articles/identity_croatians_ancient_iran.php

http://www.iranchamber.com/culture/articles/croatians_cravats_iranian_origin.php

http://www.iranchamber.com/history/articles/common_origin_croats_serbs_jats.php

>>2670495
*tips fedora*

>>2672641
>Hazara

Dirty Mongol, go back to your shithole steppe.

>>2672191
That's because the Piast dynasty was of hispanic origin, the real name of the dynasty is actually Piástez

>>2673138
>The Iranic theory of the Croat origin is perfectly plausible.

No, it's not.

>>2666614
thats a linguistic map you faggot.
as for your question, slavic languages are closer related to indic/hellenic/baltic languages than italic/germanic/celtic/thracian languages.

>>2673138
I knew the Iranians likes us Croats for some odd reason.
But these articles are downright silly in the way they want to inflate Croats.

>>2674652
>he fell for the satem meme

>>2666621
>>2666614
>slavic internet connection don't allow higher resolutions