Can we all agree on this?

>>2658776
Ballista a best

>>2658804
You dont tear walls down with ballistas.

>>2658776
Looks like a bitch to setup.

>>2658776
trebuchets are for overcompensating manlets

Those siege weapons are for different purposes.

>>>/v/

>>2658886
Why didn't the Roman military invent counterweight trebuchets?

File: onager.jpg (1MB, 2379x1548px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2379x1548px

>>2658776
Spoon catapults never existed in history.

Go back to /v/.

>>2658895
they were called onagers

Those catapults never existed in real life.

>>2658926
Look at the picture, its not what OP posted

>>2658935
Sure they did

>>2658894
Because their enemies didn't tend to build large stone castles.

>>2658894
They used ramps and towers then fuggen charged within the walls, no fucks given

File: type2[1].gif (10KB, 358x288px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 358x288px

I'd rather have 300 of these than 10 trebuchet

File: Haddock.jpg (39KB, 560x432px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 560x432px

>>2658804
>Point target artillery

>>2658946
Yeah, just large stone walls.

>>2658935
Let me guess, you also believe fire arrows and dual wielding didn't exist?

>>2658776
>>>/reddit/r/trebuchetmemes

File: intro_trebuchet_2.jpg (18KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 320x240px

>>2658962
Can that thing launch boulders, corpses or flaming sand over 300 metres?

>ywn be a royal princess, having a bath and suddenly get hit by a trebuchet projectile as it crashes through the stone and mortar of your tower.

>>2660017
flaming sand?

>>2660325
Probably something he saw in a video game

File: Greek_Fire_Catapult_(Harper's_Engraving).png (944KB, 1181x900px) Image search: [Google]

944KB, 1181x900px

>>2660348
>>2660325

treacherous threw thermal payloads all the time, as did spoon shaped catapults (they're called mangonels). I don't know what youtube historian you guys watch to get your info, but they sound pretentious.

>>2661424
>trebuchets