Charles 1st did nothing wrong.
>>2657480
>Charles 1st did nothing
That's the problem.
>>2657483
Still better than the interregnum
>>2657484
not an argument
>>2657484
Nope, we got a sovereign parliament out of it and avoided the much bloodier republican uprisings that toppled monarchs in Europe.
>>2657492
House of Lords was abolished and Monarchy came back anyway, wow such progress.
>>2657498
they got the triennial act out of it, which is pretty important
>>2657480
he lost his head
>>2658192
Sic semper tyrannis
>>2657498
The monarch that came back was a figurehead, and the monarchy never regained it's power.
>>2658314
>BY WHAT AUTHORITY AM I SUMMONED HERE
Was it autism?