Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
Anonymous
They Should've Died instead of the Romanovs 2017-04-13 09:21:37 Post No. 2655438
[Report] Image search: [Google]
They Should've Died instead of the Romanovs 2017-04-13 09:21:37 Post No. 2655438
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: Ipatyev_house_basement.jpg (578KB, 2048x1458px) Image search:
[Google]
578KB, 2048x1458px
Post dynasties that ought to have suffered in place of the Romanovs.
I start: Osmanoğlu
Responsible for retarding the development of the Eastern Mediterranean for around half a millennium. Brutal treaty breakers. Basically created a plunder economy that served their personal whims. Somehow managed to turn the Eastern Mediterranean, centre of civilisation in Europe, into a cesspit, whereas formerly barbarous Western Europe rose.
>>
Do we really have to have these endless threads from Anastasia's own Jeff Magnum (sans talent)?
>>
File: 1488764407169.png (144KB, 946x472px) Image search:
[Google]
144KB, 946x472px
All dynasties should make like the Kennedys and die off already.
>>
Nicky literally destroyed his country. His family juts suffered with him.
>>
>>2655438
Why do you even care about monarchies? They got a nasty, undeserved death, but what right any monarchy has to rule over a country? I can't really be sad about their deaths really.
>>
>>2655438
All of them.
>>
>>2655438
Ottomans were actually pretty decentralized desu. The sultan was just one cog. They couldn't even reform shit when they wanted to
The Med declined because of the New World and new trade routes
>>
>>2655658
This desu.
OP forgets that italy also started to become a shithole after the new world was found.
Also Ataturk was a civilized man he wouldn't have executed them like the barbarian commies or french revolutionaries.
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2