Is the NAP justifiable?

No because libertarianism isn't.

Communism is the only defendable ideology.

>>2652192
Anarcho-totalitarianism is the true ideology

File: welcum to leftypol.png (593KB, 1349x2046px) Image search: [Google]

593KB, 1349x2046px

>>2652192
>>2652205

>>2652207
what the fuck is this real

File: 1469866879083.png (8KB, 461x343px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 461x343px

>>2652181

>>2652207
>they are actual faggots
This explains a lot.

>>2652213
>>2652251
>what is 4chan humour
as if you've never seen people ironically say the same about hitler on this site

>agree to the NAP
>Gather mercenary army
>lol, jk guys!
>Enslave everyone and take their property

Sounds legit.

>>2652267
Did you stop to think perhaps their posts were in irony as well, dumb redditor?

Answering OP, I don't think anyone would object to the principle itself, but since it is associated with libertarianism, this triggers emotional responses from people that don't like libertarianism, even thought they would be fine with it if you gave it another time and explained it with different words. This is because we live in a time when people can't separate reason from emotion.

NAP is really stupid.

>>2652275
Have you even paused to consider that his post was also ironic you mongrel 9gagger?

>>2652278
Another name*

>>2652275
I paused, considered, and decided to think it wasn't
never been on reddit

>>2652278

I don't hate NAP because it's associated with libertarianism. I hate it because it's illogical. In an anarchic society, why wouldn't I inflict violence on my enemies?