Name an era with a higher concentration of chrarismatic leaders.
right now (2017)
Well it was the radio age of entertainment.
Shit, wasn't the first television broadcast one of Hitler's speeches?
The masses were easy to sway with a loud father figure and good rhetoric.
Now it takes a bit more finesse.
Weren't Mosley and Primo of Rivera rather irrelevant in their country's political scene?
>>2650207
Mosley was pretty irrelavant yeah. Falangist were relevant though, too bad franco the fag fucked it all up.
>>2650205
>nu age kiddies actually think this is true
topkek
WE
>National-anarchism is a radical, anti-capitalist, anti-Marxist and anti-statist right-wing ideology and movement propounded since the late 1990s by British far-right figure Troy Southgate.[1] First-wave national-anarchists advocate that different ethnic and racial groups should peacefully coexist by developing separately in their own confederations of autonomous tribal communes within a post-capitalist stateless society.[1][2]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-anarchism
>>2650239
autism
>>2650194
"charismatic leaders" are a myth, they are unremarkable people who simply align themselves to fit popular expectation. the masses create the leader figure and some schmuck shows up to play the role.
it was rather an era of particularly desperate masses.
>>2650194
How the fuck was Hitler taken seriously with that fucking mustache?
>>2650194
Two words: Charles II