>Reptiles evolved into mammals
Who allows these fucking memes to proliferate in this day and age?
>>2646688
where did mammals come from then, smart guy? back to plebbit with you kiddo.
I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE XDDDDDDD
>>2646703
A protospecies, neither reptilian nor mammalian.
>>2646708
Bullshit, fuck off Reddit
>>2646713
He's right, mammals and dinosaurs lived alongside eachother
>>2646713
>external eggs, cold blood, scales and double eyes turned into humans
Suck my dick, evolve into a non-faggot. That's clearly how you think it works.
>>2646716
>evolve into a non-faggot.
This is the single funniest thing ever put into words
>>2646688
Explain the platypus then
>>2646688
Dimetrodon was the protospecies though. It's descendants would evolve into mammal like reptiles. And then mammals.
>>2646757
This
>hurrrrrrrrrrrrrrr wut are synapsids
Just because they looked like reptiles doesn't mean they were in any way related to what we call reptiles today.
>>2646757
Dimetrodon was stem group. Its descendants likely didn't survive past the middle Permian.
>>2646716
>external eggs
Funny that you mentioned those given that reptiles that give birth to live young aren't exactly rare, hell, some of them even have fucking placenta analogues.
>>2646688
Reptile is semantics literally every vertebrate except amphibian and fish are technically reptiles. However humans came fro synapsids while birds and modern reptiles came from diapsids.
>>2646850
>literally every vertebrate except amphibian and fish are technically reptile
How do fish and amphibians escape the technically reptile status?
>>2646894
Because they arent reptiles you moron.
>>2646688
Godless fools who think they're apes.
>>2646850
>Today I learned what polyphyletic means XD
>>2646900
>literally call the head of your church a primate
>claims we're the ones with the ape fetish
>>2646688
Creationists
>>2646757
LOLWUT
>>2646894
By being older than reptiles and thus making reptiles just highly specialized amphibians/fishes.
>>2646898
>every vertebrate is a reptile
>fish and amphibians are vertebrates
>"aren't reptiles"
>>2646688
>thinking pre mammalian synapsids are reptiles
Reptile isn't a meaningful term in the context of evolution.
>>2646715
Dinosaurs are not all reptiles
>>2646757
No, Dimetrodon is a side group of the synapsids
>>2646902
That's paraphyly you dingus
>>2646918
Yes literally every vertebrate is a really mutated version of a Lancelet.
>>2646688
Judging from observations of human behavior in the whole world coupled with the need to have religions that seek to tame human nature, I can't help but be convinced that humanity descends from base animals.
>>2646914
The big ones were as big as leopards. They came in many species, some as small as cats, others the size of various Panthera.
>>2650719
You think I'm Jesus?
>>2650719
>2017
>not being a land dwelling fish
>>2650719
How the heck are amphibian and fish reptiles?
>>2651227
You've misread his post.
>>2647563
#notallreptilez
>>2651214
>2017
>not navigating intermally by the earfs magnetic core
>not knowing how magnets work, either
also, CAPTCHA is being a bizach this am
>>2650719
Man, you ask some weird questions when you pray...smhtbqh
>>2650719
>Things without lungs grow them.
>This is what evolutionists actually believe.
>>2646708
Is a Platypus some type of bird/mammal prototype that just managed to hang around longer than others?
>>2646688
>Dimetrodon
>Reptile
It's a synapsid you fucking retard
Reptiles evolved into synapids/therapsids, which evolved into proto-mammals, which evolved into mammals.
It's why "living fossils" like platypuses and echidnas lay eggs.
Reptiles also evolved into dinosaurs which evolved into birds.
>>2650957
PRAISE THE MESSIAH
HE HAS BEEN CHOSEN
Darwinian pseudoscience.
>>2651319
>not knowing that bills/beaks evolve as an evolutionary advantage across several animal classes
I bet you think the parrot fish (which have beaks as well) are a cross between fish and parrots amirite?
>>2651451
>>2649373
How are we sure that the smaller species weren't just juveniles?
>>2651451
>expecting a basic knowledge of the science from evolution-deniers
Kek.
>>2651451
b b b b but that's not what it said on the Creationist website I visited and dose guys r lik t' top scientists in tah world.