Who's more dangerous, a man with nothing to lose or a man

A man with 40% to lose.

File: 1491114011427.jpg (158KB, 478x463px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 478x463px

>>2646606

>>2646362
A man with everything to gain

A man with everything to lose

>>2646362
it really depends on what the object in danger is

>>2646676
He has more motivation, but he cannot go past the final extra mile as where the man with nothing can

File: 2312223123321212315141.png (385KB, 310x627px) Image search: [Google]

385KB, 310x627px

a lost man

>>2646362
With nothing to lose. having something to lose makes one more cautious and less likely to take risk.

>>2646686
How so?

>>2648220
Unless he's trying to protect what he has to lose.

>>2646695
A man with everything to lose is a man in need while a man with nothing to lose is driven by desire.

Needs > Desires

>>2646362
The second one, in my opinion.