Who's more dangerous, a man with nothing to lose or a man with everything to lose?
A man with 40% to lose.
>>2646606
>>2646362
A man with everything to gain
A man with everything to lose
>>2646362
it really depends on what the object in danger is
>>2646676
He has more motivation, but he cannot go past the final extra mile as where the man with nothing can
a lost man
>>2646362
With nothing to lose. having something to lose makes one more cautious and less likely to take risk.
>>2646686
How so?
>>2648220
Unless he's trying to protect what he has to lose.
>>2646695
A man with everything to lose is a man in need while a man with nothing to lose is driven by desire.
Needs > Desires
>>2646362
The second one, in my opinion.