is feminism a fenomena that always appear at the age of decandence?

>>2641278
Feminism didn't exist until late 19th century. Gubb was full of shit, read real history books.

>>2641289
explain.

It causes the age of decadence. Artificial wombs now! Rational faggot utopia NOW! Let us shake off the roastie scourge from humanity NOW!

>>2641294
It's a meme. Decadence, civilization cycles and similar notions are nothing more but dangerous myths.

File: dekadent.png (2MB, 1197x1241px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1197x1241px

>>2641328
>Decadence isn't real

Decadent detected

>>2641278
With a sample size of one feminism, we can't really conclude anything with certainty.

>>2641278
Feminism was only feasible because of the birth control pill.

The "first wave" of so-called feminism wasn't even feminism at all, it was just the extension of liberalism to include everyone in society.

So no OP, feminism proper is a consequence of mostly scientific progress, not because of cyclicality in civilizations.

>>2641278
Quite the opposite, when a civilization is to far into an age of comfort, they start to make problems up.