If Christianity never became the state religion of the Roman Empire, how would this have influenced history?
>>2640912
we would be colonizing mars
>>2640912
Most likely Manicheanism would take its place, with possibility of it becoming state religion of Persia as well, thus ending Romano-Persian conflict, preventing rise of Islam.
>>2640976
This is actually relatively reasonable as a theory.
>>2640976
I never thought about that, good point.
Another thing is that Islam would never have risen, or at least it would have risen in a very different manner.
>>2640976
>There's a timeline where Islam never existed, and instead you got stuck in this shitty version of reality.
>>2641025
Lux Invicta.
The white race would be ruling the solar system free of remorse. We would be climbing the Mount Kilimanjaro, sun-bathing on Caribbean beaches and sending our kids on school trips to the moon to collect samples for their school's science projects, knowing that under our feet lay the bones of extinct races that once walked the earth.
>>2641135
But this is not nice! We have to share all these blessings with the less fortunate! It's what Jesus would have wanted!
>>2640976
>sharing a religion prevents inter-state conflict between neighboring superpowers
Oh boy, do I have stories for you.
>>2640912
The better question is what if the Arascids/Sassanids were converted to Christianity.
We'd be living on the multi-universal Roman Empire.
>>2640912
Rome would've fell anyways, and some other organized religion would've swooped in and dominated Europe.
>>2640912
Julian the Apostate wouldn't have been an apostate, and might have been more popular.
>>2641135
>Rome still falls to constant pagan barbarian invasion
>nobody there to hold onto knowledge, pick up the pieces, or provide any form of unity
>no unifying force to fight back against Islam
>no crusades to unify Europe against invaders, and reconnect it with the larger world
>no renaissance as a result of never reconnecting and no church ever put resources into maintaining Roman/Greek knowledge
>Europe and the rest of the world kept in darkness until eventually Chinese become the technologically dominant hegemon, that takes over the world under one despot.
>Europe is a trivial backwater province, forever claiming We Wuz Romans and Shiiiiiet, because no accomplishments since then to speak of.
>>2640972
fuck you on behalf of dead monks
>>2641524
>Oh boy, do I have stories for you.
Sure, but it would do increase chances of the conflict lessening, as a common ground could be established. At least for long enough to create peace and trade treaties with possibility of alliance against common enemies.
>>2641025
>>2641011
>>2640999
>You will never live in a timeline where Roman Empire and Persian Empire are treated as equals (along with Chinese Empire)
>You will never live in a timeline where Jesus is regarded as second coming of Zoroaster, with third coming being during Apocalypse
>You will never live in a timeline with Manichaeism under command of equal Patriarchs, spreading from Europe to China
>>2640912
No Protestantism for one