What is the history of this image?

>>2634998
As for as I know (and I don't know much) he kind of looks like one of those riders that went shooting people while on horseback, or otherwise just used horses as a quick way to move around. Look at the spur on the boot, for example.

>>2635004
A dragoon? True, it does look like he is holding an early carbine.

>>2635007
Not sure if you could classify him as a dragoon. Honstly, the only reason I even know of renaissance horse-gunners is because of Total War: Medieval 2. Might be best to wait for another person to help you out.

>>2635013
Thank you for your attempt, anon.

>>2635019
Searched a bit further. Best I can come up with are cuirassiers and harquebussiers. There's a mega.nz with .pdfs about 17th century warfare. You might be able to get more information from that: https://mega.nz/#F!ZAoVjbQB!iGfDqfBDpgr0GC-NHg7KFQ!VYgiwQTA

Even though it gives more information about grander strategy, I assume.

>>2635019
>>2635048
Also, found some stuff about a certain "Stefano Borin" whose gear kind of looks like the guy in the OP's. Might want to giv that a further search.

>>2635048
Ah, perfect! I'll download it once I get on my desktop, thank you.

>>2635054
Anytime.

>>2635058
"Stefano Borin" is apparently an artist, much of his work is reminiscent of the OP's image.

File: Hazelriggs-Lobsters-a-regiment-of-Curiassiers-were-destroyed-at-Roundaway-Down.jpg (85KB, 600x762px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 600x762px

>Wheel-lock
>Spurs
>Still armored

He is a cuirassier or heavy dragoon from around the 30 years war period

Here is a depiction of a cuirassier from the English Civil War

>>2635290
Perfect, this is exactly the information I was looking for. Thanks, based anon.

>>2635290
why are they so heavily armed and the horses aren't?

Wouldn't it be perfectly possible for someone to shoot or maim the horse and make him fall over (which could be enough to hurt him) ?

>>2635324
What kind of sick fuck is going to hurt an innocent horse?

File: Thomas_Jones_Barker_-_The_Moss-trooper.jpg (2MB, 2348x3177px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2348x3177px

>>2635007
>>2635013

I believe dragoons came latter and we're not as armoured. The picture in OP looks like a Cuirassier.

>>2635393
I agree, anon.

>>2635336

The sick fuck that's tired of the sick fucks on horseback shooting at him.

File: kriegskunst-pferd-arkebussier-gewehr-rc3bcstung-1616.jpg (309KB, 794x626px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 794x626px

>>2634998
Mounted harquebussier.

The sling used to hold the arquebus and the lack of armor for the lower body indicates he isn't a cuirassier. Or he is a later English Civil War Era dragoon.

>>2635324
Half the point of them is high mobility
Why would you add armour to a fast moving unit that'll slow it down.

>>2635835
how long will that fast moving unit keep moving if anyone can shoot at it though?

>>2635846
There's an effective range of muskets, plus time to aim
Dragoons have the advantage that they can manuever into and out of effective range much quicker than infantry.
In other words they can get shots off, run away and take much less casualties than their target.

>>2635846
Armor on horses in the pike and shot era would be pretty useless. Bullets would be able to punch through the majority of armor that could be fit onto a horse, and the armor that could stop the bullet would really weigh the horse down. Melee doesn't really matter as if your dragoons are in melee with pikemen then you fucked up.

>>2635324
Horses are a lot bigger than humans and harder to kill. You need to hit a horse in the right place to actually bring it down.

>>2635324
The chances of killing/debilitating a horse with a single shot is pretty slim.

>>2635853
>>2635858
>>2635835
Pretty much a combo of this.

>>2635860
Yeah, but damage to the legs puts them out of commission, even if they aren't dead.

Anyone know of a good documentary on gunpowder weapons in warfaire.

Specifically interested in late renaisance/30 years war and 7 years war eras. Somewhat interested in stuff in middle east and British Colonies as well.

>>2636918
Check out Osprey books. Matchlock Musketeer: 1588–1688 is actually very good.

>>2635846
That's why they needed to be fast, so that they could close the distance before the enemy got many shots off.

>>2635393
In this period a dragoon was mounted infantry. They would either accompany and support "real" cavalry on raids, or dismount ahead or to the side of the main army to harass the enemy.

>>2634998
He could be described as either a reiter, curassier, petronel or mounted harquebusier. The terms are inexact and their definitions changed subtly over time and place.

>>2636979
Thank you for your concise answering and clearing up some of the malaise.

What're your thoughts on the veracity of the historical use of and effectiveness of the caracole tactic?

>>2637295
I made a post about it a few hours ago here >>2636854

Two different things can be meant by the term caracole. The first is a sort of countermarch intended for cavalry. The second is the cavalry galloping towards the enemy, firing off their pistols and then falling back instead of closing.

This is one of the historians I mentioned who struggled to find evidence that the "countermarch" caracole every happened
http://www.investigationsofadog.co.uk/tag/caracole/

I think it is much more likely that when this term was used in the period it meant simply to fire the guns and wheel off without closing to use contact weapons. Period commentators such as François de la Noue were critical of this technique since wheeling away instead of charging left the cavalry vulnerable to a countercharge into their rear.

>>2637485
So, it either didn't happen, or it was just a bad idea (dependant upon the type they were utilising)?

>>2635860
>>2635858
>>2635853
>>2635835

So if armor was so useless why would the riders wear them?

What irks me is that the rider is all armoires up while the horse (a huge target) is bare naked.

>>2634998
>though isn't he too heavily armoured in his half munitions plate and chainmail?
Yes of course, Armour inhibits movement which is why you get a negative buff on using ranged weapons.

No, life isn't a video game, its absolutely fine.

He's an early Harqubusier. They wore stripped down plate armour which over time got less and less eventually just becoming the chest plate and helmet to nothing in the end.

>>2635324
It's actually really fucking hard to kill a horse.

>>2640308
It costs a lot of money and more often than not the rider rather than the horse is targeted.

>>2640321
have you ever seen a horse? If they trip they are done for.

They are really strong and fast but they're legs are fragile.

If you're able to shoot a horse's legs or thighs he would fall over and die