NEW CHARTS: POLITICAL AND IDEOLOGICAL ORIGINS OF NAZISM

File: originspart2.png (1MB, 1440x900px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x900px

here is part two chart

File: Altright v SJW.jpg (122KB, 900x929px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 900x929px

>>2632726
Would love to see more heres one i have.

File: naziiii.png (4MB, 2080x1300px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2080x1300px

>>2632738
nazi chart from yesterday.

File: Nazism.png (2MB, 1350x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1350x2160px

>>2632756
kek
i'll continue my chart making on nazis, as the subject is popular on here, for obvious reasons... the next chart will be the relationship of fascism, nazism and marxism, with books on totalitarianism obviously. I had posted this incomplete chart the other day where you can see some of the books i would put in such a chart

>>2632726
Does anyone here have a chart (or a recommendation for a book) on egypt/mesopotamia?

File: 1476064129562.png (602KB, 963x720px) Image search: [Google]

602KB, 963x720px

>>2632756
>SJWs want all races and cultures to be segregated from each other

File: 1489615828234.png (1MB, 1440x900px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x900px

>>2632971
have you seen this other chart i made? its got books on those topics

>>2633113
thanks man.

>>2632984
Most of the crap around cultural appropriation.

>>2632787
>>2632764
>>2632738
>>2632726
No Ian Kershaw?

>>2633296
literally wat m8. look closer lmao.
>hitler: hubris, hitler: nemesis,
>why did german democracy fail
>nazi dictatorship: problems and perspectives of interpretation
>the hitler myth

File: IMG_8822.jpg (3MB, 4500x3090px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4500x3090px

Here's my chart. I've considered making new ones about /his/ approved films per historical era, or making one about Byzantium.

Would you classify this chart as pro-nazi, anti-nazi or neutral?

>>2633445
Huh, yeah, sorry m80

>>2633459
Bruh, get some HH Scullard in there

>>2633568
Its ok senpai, are there any particular kershaw works im missing though?

>>2633459
>tom holland
fucking hell, at least put scholars, not memers like him

>>2633607
There's a reason why I mentioned it was
1. pop history
2. for people who've never read a history book before
3. The most basic work to begin with

It's not supposed to be a oxford bibliography or companion to Rome, it's supposed to be a starting point love. I've included actual university texts if people wanted something more advanced to start with.

>>2633499
Id say neutral as theyre all professional historians. Maybe ill put a label up on anything thats too antinazi.

File: Screen Shot 2017-04-08 at 1.39.00 PM.png (815KB, 784x536px) Image search: [Google]

815KB, 784x536px

>>2633976
bump for the night