Hi, source? is this colored to prove a racial point?

>>2623769

In the artistic conventions of the time, higher status figures are colored lighter than lower status ones.

File: kangz.jpg (19KB, 345x222px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 345x222px

>>2623769
yes this is heavily colored. And they weren't washing dicks they were circumcising.

thx /his/

>>2623793
The higher class would have fairer skin and the servants would be more tanned. Other than that they look the same race to me.

1/10 need stronger bait, gentlemen.

>>2623810
So there are no niggers in this picture, since none of them have light skin like that.

>>2623769
They're not cleaning them. They're circumcising them.

File: 2f74ef28aa4708436442e083db31136d.jpg (185KB, 534x696px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 534x696px

>>2623789
>>2623810
When will you fucking retards realize skin tones didn't matter in Ancient Egypt, you could be jet black or brown, IT DIDN'T MATTER YOU SKIN COLOR. What mattered was your position in society.

Let me be very clear to settle this retarded ass notion, from the very top down, were people of various shades of "black".

Ahmose-Nefertari is depicted in all of her engravings as jet black, she was the first queen of the 18th dynasty, and daughter of the Pharoah Seqenenre Tao.

So stop with the bullshit, I swear some of you kids are no worse than the revisionist afrocentrists you so love to hate.