>I'm a classical liberal. So you're Enlightenment scum?

Classical liberals and modern liberals are one in the same. Except classical liberals don't want to be taxed as much.

>>2613340
Enlightenment liberal political principles coupled with Romantic ethics and artistic philosophy, with some Roman Virtue and Bucolic reverence is the perfect structure for a society.

>>2613341
"classical liberals" are lolbertarians.

>>2613364
>"classical liberals" are lolbertarians

Not so. You can be both, but they aren't the same thing. You can be either without being the other.

I'm a Whig.

I'm the kind of asshole who calls themselves a Whig.

>I'm...

no you're not. Nobody fits any ideology perfectly, everyone is a mixture of multiple influences, and that's honestly the best case scenario considering the majority of people simply side with whatever belief sits right with their fee fees or is compatible with their ingroup.

Such pointless discussions people have labeling each other. If you actually bothered explaining your beliefs to each other on an individual case-by-case basis you'd see that your beliefs are not the cookie-cutter perspective of a single ideology.